In a rare instance of accuracy, exit polls for the recently concluded Delhi Assembly elections have proven correct, with the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) emerging as the winner. After a contentious and fiercely fought election, the final results confirmed what several exit polls had predicted — a significant victory for the BJP, which will now form the next government in the national capital.
Exit polls, which have often drawn criticism for their inaccuracies in past elections, gained credibility this time as they accurately forecasted the BJP’s success in Delhi. Early trends of vote counting indicated that the party had secured a strong lead, surpassing the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), which had hoped to retain power for a third consecutive term under the leadership of former chief minister Arvind Kejriwal.
The BJP’s victory is attributed to a number of factors, including a robust campaign focusing on local issues such as security, infrastructure, and economic development. The party also capitalized on growing discontent among certain sections of Delhi’s electorate with the AAP government’s performance over the past few years. Analysts point to the BJP’s stronghold in areas affected by anti-incumbency sentiments as key to their victory.
While Kejriwal and AAP campaigned vigorously, presenting their achievements in governance, it was clear that the public mood had shifted, as predicted by the exit polls. The BJP’s messaging around issues like national security and governance resonated with voters.
The results of the Delhi elections are significant not only for the capital but also for the larger national political scenario.
For once, exit polls, which often come under scrutiny for their reliability, have demonstrated a level of accuracy that has been welcomed by political observers. The party’s victory in Delhi, along with the validation of exit poll predictions, may provide renewed confidence in these surveys moving forward.
The BJP is leading in 46 of Delhi’s 70 assembly seats while AAP was ahead in 24, according to the trends released by the Election Commission.
Bharatiya Janata Party supporters erupted in celebration at its Pandit Pant Marg office as the latest counting trends showing the party returning to power in the national capital after almost three decades with a decisive mandate.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi expected to join the celebrations later this evening and address the party workerd.
Party workers danced to the beats of dhol and waved party flags, creating festive atmosphere. With the saffron flag waving high and the victory chants echoing in the air, BJP workers expressed elation over what they saw as the reaffirmation of their party’s dominance in the national capital.
The BJP is leading on clear majority of Delhi’s 70 assembly seats, according to the trends released by the Election Commission.
The BJP’s confidence comes in the wake of securing a larger share of the vote and leading key constituencies that had once been AAP strongholds, which is a blow to the latter’s aspirations to expand its foothold in Delhi.
Photo by Naveen Bansal
On leading in the Kalkaji assembly constituency, BJP candidate Ramesh Bidhuri said, “I thank the people of Kalkaji. This lead is of the people of Kalkaji. In the last 10 years, the people of Kalkaji wept tears of blood because no development work was done in the constituency…”
On the other hand, the AAP office in central Delhi was quiet as the results continued to pour in. There was no sign of any celebration or anticipation.
The party leadership had hoped for a better outcome, expecting to retain control over Delhi with a majority mandate. However, the results reflected a shift in voter sentiment, especially among certain key demographic groups.
The big guns for the AAP including party convenor Arvind Kejriwal and incumbent Chief Minister Atishi are trailing. From the early leads, Kejriwal is behind BJP’s Parvesh Sahib Singh , while Atishi is trailing in Kalkaji while former Deputy CM Manish Sisodia has been defeated.
The High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh on Tuesday dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by PDP chief and former Chief Minister Mehbooba Mufti seeking the transfer of undertrial prisoners lodged in jails outside the Union Territory back to Jammu and Kashmir.
According to a report from Srinagar, a division bench comprising Chief Justice Arun Palli and Justice Rajnesh Oswal termed the petition “misconceived” and observed that courts cannot be used as instruments for political or electoral gain. The court described the plea as vague, lacking factual foundation and apparently driven by an attempt to project political advantage.
Mufti had approached the court claiming that families of several Kashmiri undertrials had urged her to raise the issue of their detention in prisons outside J&K. However, the bench noted that the petition failed to identify any such family or specify the undertrial prisoners whose cause was being represented.
The court also pointed out that no specific transfer orders had been challenged or placed on record. It said the undertrials concerned had themselves not raised any grievance regarding their transfer, and therefore the petitioner, as a third party, had no locus standi to invoke the court’s jurisdiction.
Observing that the plea was based on incomplete and unsubstantiated facts, the bench said the petition carried clear political overtones. It noted that Mehbooba Mufti is the president of a prominent political party currently in opposition and appeared to have approached the court to position herself as a champion of a particular section.
The court reiterated that Public Interest Litigation cannot be used to advance partisan agendas or convert courts into political platforms. “PIL is also not a mechanism for gaining political leverage, and the Courts cannot serve as a forum for electoral campaigns. While political parties possess manifold legitimate avenues to engage with the electorate, courts cannot be employed as an instrument for achieving electoral advantage,” the bench stated.
The High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh on Monday granted the government additional time to file its objections to a batch of petitions challenging the administration’s decision to declare 25 books as “forfeited” in the Union Territory.
A full bench comprising Chief Justice Arun Palli, Justice Rajnesh Oswal, and Justice Shahzad Azeem adjourned the matter to February 11 next year. The court made it clear that appropriate orders would follow if the government failed to submit its response by then.
The petitions have been filed by Shakir Shabir, Swastik Singh, David Devadas, CPI(M) leader Muhammad Yousuf Tarigami, Air Vice Marshal Kapil Kak, and others.
One of the petitions, filed by Kapil Kak and others — including academic Sumantra Bose, whose two books have been forfeited, author Radha Kumar, and former Chief Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah — invokes Section 99 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), seeking to set aside the forfeiture order.
The petitioners have argued that the government notification merely cites statutory provisions without outlining specific grounds for the forfeiture. They contend that the order fails to distinguish between the government’s “opinion” and the legally required “grounds” supporting that opinion, which, they argue, must be clearly stated in the notification itself.
The petitions seek to quash the notification dated August 5, 2025, issued by the Home Department of the Jammu and Kashmir government.
The books declared forfeited include political and historical works such as The Kashmir Dispute 1947–2012 by A G Noorani; Kashmir at the Crossroads and Contested Lands by Sumantra Bose; In Search of a Future: The Kashmir Story by David Devadas; Azadi by Arundhati Roy; and A Dismantled State: The Untold Story of Kashmir After Article 370 by journalist Anuradha Bhasin.
The recent occurrences in Bangladesh were really shocking. The Indian government’s Foreign Affairs Ministry has responded sharply to the incidents. The reported assaults on Bangladeshi Hindu minorities have been denounced by India. However, India is also extremely vigilant and cautious, which is why the Indian government is not reacting hastily, regardless of the response of any individual politician. Right now, the situation is really sensitive.
The Bangladeshi government must conduct an investigation as soon as possible to identify the entity responsible for these atrocities. However, it can be claimed that fundamentalist forces and extremist Islamists dominate Bangladesh. As a result of ongoing efforts to return Bangladesh to the pre-1971 undivided era, one Hindu man, Dipu Chandra Das, was lynched, his body was chained to a tree, and then set on fire.
However, Sharif Osman Hadi, a youth leader and alleged anti-Indian propagandist, who was pushing Bangladesh toward militancy, passed away at Singapore General Hospital while receiving treatment. Hadi has sustained gunshot injuries during an assassination attempt in Bangladesh’s capital, Dhaka, last week. Following his passing, the interim administration arranged a state funeral and granted him martyr status.
Muhammad Yunus, the chief adviser of Bangladesh’s interim government, attended Hadi’s funeral, demonstrating how the Yunus administration legitimised the anti-Indian ideology, philosophy, and attempts of Islamic fundamentalists to take Bangladesh to pre-independence era. Following this role, Muhammad Yunus may be held accountable for this outrage since, as the state’s administrator, he has failed to safeguard Bangladesh’s peace, calm, and law and order. Now that BNP leaders have also been assassinated, their anger has grown.
Jamaat is also extremely irritated since, despite their desire to propagate Islamic ideas, they are now the targets of these radical fundamentalist actions and have been held accountable for them. However, the Jamaat seeks an early election because they haven’t been part of Bangladesh’s electoral parliamentary politics. Similar to the RSS in India, they have always been a supporting force and have never taken part in an election. They want to take part and win the election this time. They have no idea how the election would be conducted in this scenario.
Following these disputes, the Bangladeshi army leader decided to call the Indian army chief for a conversation. The head of the Bangladeshi army stated that they aimed a stable bilateral relationship with India and wanted peace and quiet because the common people on both sides are most affected by the hostility in their relationship.
They discussed how the Pakistani army already controls the Bangladeshi army and that the ISI commander was in Bangladesh a few months ago. Additionally, militant commanders asserted that China and Pakistan would assist them in capturing the ‘Seven Sisters of India’. Therefore, it will be extremely challenging for Bangladesh if Pakistan’s influence grows in Bangladesh, which could lead to the suspension of visa operations for both India and Bangladesh or the emergence of drastic action by India.
India does not want the election to be cancelled in this case, but it might be postponed if all political factions decide to put pressure on Yunus to resign and the military authority takes over. However, the election date has already been set for February 12, 2026, and Ramadan will begin on February 17, when the poll cannot be held. What will then happen? Will there be a postponement of the election? The scenario will become more difficult if the election is postponed. However, the bilateral relationship between the two countries must remain intact and be state-to-state rather than party-based, regardless of which party is in power in Bangladesh.
The decision to allow construction in ecologically sensitive parts of the Aravallis, along with redefined boundaries based on height, has sparked widespread outrage. The hashtag #SaveAravalli quickly trended on social media, as thousands of activists, citizens, and lawyers voiced their opposition.
Digital campaigns flooded social media platforms, with petitions and infographics calling on the government to revoke the ruling and protect the Aravallis. Activists argue that this battle is not just about a mountain range; it’s about safeguarding India’s environmental future. An NGO-Change.org has also launched a signature campaign in this regard.
Critics of the decision warn that it will strip vast areas of legal protection, paving the way for urbanization, mining, and deforestation. Such unchecked development threatens the fragile ecosystems that rely on the Aravallis’ natural integrity.
Environmentalists and scientists have raised alarms about the devastating consequences of the ruling. Dr. Priya Mehta, an ecologist with two decades of research on the Aravallis, explains, “We are not just talking about mountains; we’re talking about an irreplaceable ecosystem. Losing the Aravallis would mean losing our ability to combat desertification and climate change in one of India’s most vulnerable regions.”
Local communities, many of whom depend on the Aravallis for water and agriculture, have echoed these concerns. G.S. Gulati, a farmer from Haryana, says, “The Aravallis are our lifeblood. If they are destroyed, we’ll lose everything.”
In response to the growing crisis, Union Environment Minister Bhupender Yadav inaugurated a workshop in Udaipur, Rajasthan, focused on devising strategies for restoring the Aravallis. The workshop emphasized ecological restoration, community participation, and sustainable livelihoods, aiming to involve local communities in eco-restoration efforts and promote sustainable practices like eco-tourism and agroforestry.
While environmentalists and local communities are fighting to preserve the Aravallis, some government and pro-development advocates argue that urbanization and mining are necessary for economic growth. They claim that exploiting the region’s resources could create jobs and stimulate infrastructure development. However, critics view this as a short-sighted approach, prioritizing immediate economic gains over long-term ecological stability. Environmental lawyer Aarav Gupta warns, “Once the Aravallis are gone, they’re gone forever. The cost of their destruction will outweigh any temporary economic benefit.”
The Aravallis are more than just a source of resources; they are a vital ecological shield that has shaped the climate and ecology of northwest India for over a billion years. The hills provide essential services—such as preventing desertification, replenishing groundwater, and protecting the National Capital Region from toxic air pollution. For generations, local communities have thrived alongside this delicate ecosystem. Destroying it would have catastrophic consequences.
The future of the Aravallis remains uncertain, but the movement to protect them continues to gain momentum. Protests, petitions, and legal challenges are pushing forward with renewed determination. With growing public support and scientific evidence on their side, defenders of the Aravallis are working tirelessly to preserve the region’s ecological health.
Rain in the plains and fresh snowfall in the higher reaches marked the beginning of Chillai Kalan, Kashmir’s harshest 40-day winter period, bringing relief after a prolonged dry spell across Jammu and Kashmir, according to a report from Srinagar..
Light to moderate snowfall was reported from high-altitude areas, including Gulmarg, Sonamarg, Sinthan Top, Peer Ki Gali and Zojila Pass, while widespread rainfall lashed the plains of Kashmir, Chenab Valley and the Pir Panjal region.
The precipitation ended weeks of dry weather that had raised concerns over water availability, agriculture, forest fires and public health. Farmers and orchardists welcomed the change, saying the rain would help improve soil moisture and revive Rabi crops that had suffered due to lack of rainfall.
Several mountain passes and key roads, including the Mughal Road, Zojila Pass and routes connecting Warwan, Marwa and Kishtwar, were temporarily closed due to snow accumulation. Authorities said restoration of traffic would depend on weather conditions.
The Meteorological Department has forecast more rain in the plains and snowfall in the upper reaches over the next 48 hours, raising hopes of a healthy winter season after last year’s deficit snowfall.
In a move that has triggered both intrigue and scepticism, the government has introduced the G-RAM-G Bill as a replacement for the much-loved MGNREGA (Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act). While the name change might seem superficial, the underlying shift is significant.
The transition from MGNREGA to G-RAM-G is not just a rebranding but a rethinking of how rural development and employment will be handled in India. The new Bill promises to offer a more modern, effective, and sustainable framework, but questions about its long-term impact and effectiveness remain.
Before Tehelka delves into the specifics of the G-RAM-G Bill, it’s important to first understand the significance of MGNREGA, which has been a key part of India’s rural development strategy since its inception in 2005. MGNREGA was established with the goal of guaranteeing at least 100 days of wage employment per year to rural households, thereby alleviating poverty and boosting rural infrastructure.
Key Features of MGNREGA:
Employment Guarantee: MGNREGA guarantees 100 days of work per household in rural areas. This was revolutionary at the time of its launch because it provided an income safety net to the rural poor, particularly during lean agricultural seasons.
Focus on Rural Infrastructure: The program has created thousands of kilometers of rural roads, irrigation systems, and water conservation projects. It encouraged community-driven projects that were often designed by local villagers themselves.
Decentralized Implementation: One of the standout features of MGNREGA was its decentralization. It allowed for local bodies like Panchayats to play a role in project planning and execution, making the program more locally relevant and responsive.
Wage Payment: The payment was often made through direct bank transfers, which aimed to provide transparency and reduce corruption. However, delays in payments and inefficiencies in disbursing funds were common criticisms.
Despite its successes in alleviating poverty and creating rural infrastructure, MGNREGA had its share of problems. Implementation challenges such as wage delays, corrupt practices, and misuse of funds persisted. The program was also often criticized for not providing sufficient skills development or sustainable long-term economic growth. These limitations likely contributed to the shift toward the G-RAM-G framework.
The G-RAM-G Bill:
The G-RAM-G Bill, while sharing some similarities with MGNREGA, brings new dimensions to rural employment and development. The name itself — G-RAM-G — is symbolic of a shift in focus from Mahatma Gandhi (whose name has been used to represent rural welfare) to RAM, an acronym that signifies a new approach: Rural Agricultural and Manufacturing Growth. The introduction of RAM indicates a broader vision that moves beyond mere employment to creating self-sustaining rural economies
Salient Features of the G-RAM-G Bill:
Broader Economic Focus: Unlike MGNREGA, which primarily focused on creating manual labor opportunities, G-RAM-G emphasizes a holistic economic approach. The bill aims to integrate agriculture and manufacturing to provide long-term growth opportunities. This is aligned with the government’s vision of a “Atmanirbhar Bharat” (self-reliant India), encouraging rural communities to become self-sustaining in various sectors.
Skilled Employment: One of the major changes is the focus on skill development. G-RAM-G intends to create a workforce that is not only involved in manual labor but is also equipped with vocational and technical skills. Training in areas like agri-tech, machine operations, and digital literacy will be key components. This upskilling would ideally make rural workers more employable in diverse sectors.
Technology Integration: G-RAM-G aims to bring in technological innovation. The program encourages the use of drones, satellite mapping, and mobile apps to enhance productivity, manage resources, and ensure transparency. This focus on technology could transform the rural economy by optimizing resource management and increasing agricultural yields.
Private Sector Involvement: Another key difference is the increased role of the private sector. While MGNREGA was predominantly a government-run initiative, G-RAM-G encourages private-public partnerships (PPPs) to create better infrastructure and long-term employment opportunities. This could include collaborations with agri-businesses, manufacturing companies, and even tech startups.
Rural Entrepreneurship: Instead of focusing solely on wage labor, G-RAM-G also places a significant emphasis on fostering entrepreneurship in rural areas. The bill includes provisions for low-interest loans and grants to encourage small businesses, local manufacturing, and agri-startups. This shift aims to generate not just employment but also wealth in rural communities.
Sustainability and Green Initiatives: The G-RAM-G Bill emphasizes sustainability by encouraging green practices. Rural development under this framework will prioritize eco-friendly methods in agriculture, water conservation, and energy use. Projects like organic farming, renewable energy solutions, and waste-to-energy technologies will be promoted.
Increased Fund Allocation and Monitoring: The new bill provides for better fund management and allocation. While the government promises more funding for G-RAM-G compared to MGNREGA, the monitoring of the fund’s use will be more stringent. Technology-driven monitoring systems are expected to improve transparency and reduce the chances of misuse of resources.
Performance-based Incentives: G-RAM-G also includes an innovative approach to performance-based rewards. If local bodies and communities meet specific goals, such as increasing agricultural productivity or boosting manufacturing output, they will receive incentives in the form of additional funding or grants for new projects.
G-RAM-G vs MGNREGA: A Comparative Analysis
Nature of Employment: MGNREGA was primarily about providing wage-based employment, often in the form of manual labor. G-RAM-G, on the other hand, seeks to diversify rural employment by integrating agriculture, manufacturing, and entrepreneurship. The focus shifts from merely providing temporary employment to creating sustainable, skill-based employment opportunities.
Role of Technology: While MGNREGA made some use of technology for fund transfers and project monitoring, G-RAM-G intends to harness cutting-edge technology for resource management, agricultural improvements, and digital training. The integration of AI, drones, and mobile platforms is aimed at transforming how rural projects are planned and executed.
Long-term Economic Goals: MGNREGA’s focus was primarily on immediate relief through wages and infrastructure projects. G-RAM-G, however, is designed to foster long-term economic development by promoting skill-building, entrepreneurship, and rural manufacturing. It aligns more closely with India’s aspirations to become a self-sufficient economy.
Private Sector and Entrepreneurship: The G-RAM-G Bill is more attuned to the idea of rural entrepreneurship and partnerships with the private sector. MGNREGA, in contrast, remained more government-centric, with limited involvement from the private sector. The move towards fostering businesses in rural areas could stimulate innovation and create diverse income sources for the population.
Funding and Efficiency: One of the criticisms of MGNREGA was the inefficient use of funds and the delay in payments. G-RAM-G promises more rigorous financial oversight, along with the introduction of performance-based incentives, which could improve the program’s overall effectiveness.
Crux:
The shift from MGNREGA to the G-RAM-G Bill marks a pivotal moment in India’s approach to rural employment and development. By focusing on skill development, entrepreneurship, and technology, G-RAM-G aims to transform rural India into a hub of sustainable growth.
However, questions remain about whether the government can effectively implement this ambitious plan. The success of G-RAM-G will depend on local capacities, the willingness of communities to adopt new technologies, and the ability to foster genuine public-private partnerships.
In summary, while MGNREGA will always be remembered as a landmark initiative in rural welfare, the G-RAM-G Bill offers a bold new direction. It promises to bridge the gap between rural poverty and self-sufficiency — but the journey from theory to practice will be a challenging one. Whether it will live up to its ambitious goals remains to be seen.
In a tragic incident that has sparked outrage across Assam, at least 7 elephants were killed, and one was injured after a herd of jumbos was hit by the Sairang-New Delhi Rajdhani Express in Assam’s Hojai district early on Dec 20, officials said. Five coaches and the train’s engine were also derailed.
The accident occurred near the railway tracks in the Nagaon district, a region known for its rich biodiversity and large elephant population. The collision is believed to have taken place during the train’s scheduled journey from New Delhi to Guwahati.
According to eyewitnesses and railway officials, the elephants were crossing the tracks when the high-speed train, unable to stop in time, struck the herd. Despite the efforts of the train driver to apply emergency brakes, the fast-moving train could not avoid hitting the animals, which are often known to migrate through this region in search of food and water.
Assam Forest Minister, Prafulla Kumar Mahanta, expressed deep sorrow at the loss, calling it “a heart-breaking event” that highlights the growing conflict between wildlife and infrastructure development in the region. “This tragic accident underscores the urgent need for measures to protect wildlife corridors and ensure safer passage for animals in Assam,” Mahanta stated in a press briefing.
The elephants, which are an endangered species in the region, were part of a larger herd that had been spotted crossing the tracks earlier in the evening. Wildlife experts believe that the herd was likely migrating through the area during the night, a common pattern for elephants, which are known to travel long distances in search of resources.
The collision has drawn immediate criticism from environmentalists and wildlife activists, who are calling for stricter safety protocols for trains running through areas with significant wildlife populations. “Incidents like this are not only tragic but also preventable,” said Dr. Rina Bhattacharya, a prominent wildlife conservationist based in Guwahati. “We need to invest in wildlife corridors, warning systems, and speed regulations in vulnerable zones. The loss of seven elephants is a blow to the already endangered population of elephants in Assam.”
In response to the incident, the Assam Forest Department has announced an inquiry into the matter, pledging to examine whether the train was operating within the speed limits for areas near wildlife habitats. They have also called for immediate measures to be implemented to protect elephants, including the installation of wildlife warning signs along rail tracks and more frequent patrols of known elephant migration routes.
Railway officials have expressed their condolences, emphasizing that the safety of both passengers and wildlife is a priority for the Indian Railways. “This is a tragic and unforeseen incident,” said an official from the Northeast Frontier Railway zone. “We will cooperate fully with the authorities to understand the cause of the accident and work towards preventing such incidents in the future.”
Assam’s elephant population has been under increasing threat due to habitat loss, human-wildlife conflict, and poaching. The state is home to around 5,000 wild elephants, with many living in the Kaziranga National Park and surrounding areas. The collision comes just days after the state government declared plans to implement new wildlife conservation programs aimed at reducing human-animal conflicts.
Hundreds of flights had been cancelled daily, leaving thousands stranded, scrambling for re-bookings, and facing disrupted holidays, business commitments, and even medical emergencies. The fallout extends beyond flights: missed hotel bookings, lost hours, and compromised plans paint a grim picture of systemic failure.
The airline’s official statement that the chaos stemmed from “misjudgement and planning gaps” is far from sufficient. The real culprit lies in a combination of IndiGo’s strategic miscalculations and the regulator’s hesitant response. The Flight Duty Time Limitations (FDTL)rules, phased in from July and fully enforced from November 1, 2025, were designed to reduce pilot fatigue — a critical operational risk — by extending weekly rest periods, limiting night-time landings, and capping night flying hours. For an airline operating a dense domestic network with numerous night and red-eye flights, anticipating the impact of these changes was not optional; it was imperative.
Indeed, IndiGo’s crew supply fell short of what was required. Data presented to the DGCA highlighted the shortfall: the airline needed 2,422 captains and 2,153 first officers for stable operations but had only 2,357 captains and 2,194 first officers. In a high-frequency network, even minor gaps cascade, causing cancellations across multiple routes. Despite clear signals, IndiGo’s preparedness was insufficient, resulting in operational chaos.
The regulator’s response has raised eyebrows. In the face of mounting public pressure, the DGCA temporarily relaxed some FDTL norms. While intended to restore operations, this decision risks compromising the very safety standards the rules were designed to protect. Pilot bodies have rightly flagged the move as a dilution of crew welfare and safety, highlighting the fine balance regulators must maintain between operational continuity and safety compliance.
The human cost has been staggering: families stranded during the peak holiday season, senior citizens struggling with travel, defence personnel delayed mid-transfer, and business commitments disrupted. Ironically, international flights — though a smaller share of cancellations — remained largely unaffected due to higher revenues and stricter compensation rules, highlighting the prioritization of profit over domestic passenger welfare.
The lessons are clear. IndiGo must be held accountable for its mismanagement, and the DGCA cannot bow to public or corporate pressure at the cost of safety standards. The Indian air passenger deserves robust compensation rights, transparent communication, and a regulator willing to enforce rules without fear or favour. Operational efficiency cannot come at the cost of safety and trust. The recent chaos is a stark reminder: in aviation, as in life, shortcuts in planning and oversight can have consequences that ripple far beyond the runway.
While Tehelka’s Cover Story finds out how the IndiGo Meltdown Exposed India’s Broken Aviation Governance, our Investigative Story lays bare the bottlenecks in Special Intensive Revision for election reforms.
Violence broke out in Bangladesh after the death of a leading figure of the youth movement that toppled former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina.
Sharif Osman Hadi, a key student/youth leader from Bangladesh’s 2024 pro-democracy movement, died on December 18 after being shot earlier in Dhaka. His death has ignited widespread protests and violence across the country.
Sharif Osman Hadi was shot by masked assailants while leaving a mosque in Dhaka last week and succumbed to his injuries on Thursday during treatment in Singapore. The attack occurred a day after authorities announced the date for the country’s first elections since the 2024 uprising, which Hadi had intended to contest as an independent.
As news of his death spread on Thursday, hundreds of supporters assembled at a square in the capital to stage protests. Protests, blockades, and marches have now spread from Dhaka to Chattogram, Rajshahi, Sylhet and many other districts. Large crowds are demanding justice, arrest of those responsible, and accountability from the interim government.
Meanwhile, Slogans condemning India and demanding Hadi’s killers be brought back echoed throughout Dhaka, Rajshahi, and Chittagong.
Amid the broader unrest, a Hindu man, named Dipu Chandra Das, was lynched by a mob in Mymensingh after being accused of blasphemy. The interim government has condemned the act and arrested several suspects in this connection.
The interim government, led by Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus, has declared a national day of mourning and called for calm. It has pledged an investigation into both Hadi’s death and the incident of communal lynching.
Police and paramilitary forces have been deployed in major urban areas to try to contain the violence and restore order.
The situation remains highly volatile with daily protests, violent outbreaks, attacks on institutions, and significant pressure on the interim government. There are rising concerns about worsening communal tensions and threats to press freedom.
Students and activists have blocked highways, staged marches from university campuses, and held symbolic funeral prayers for Hadi.
Mobs torched the offices of Bangladesh’s two leading newspapers — Prothom Alo and The Daily Star — halting publication for the first time in decades. Journalists were trapped inside during the attacks before being rescued. For the first time in its history of 27 years, Prothom Alo, Bangladesh’s leading newspaper, was shut on Friday. Its online version was closed for about 17 hours after a violent mob vandalised and looted Prothom Alo’s office in Dhaka before setting it on fire.
Demonstrators also attacked cultural centers like Chhayanaut in Dhaka, causing vandalism and fires. Protesters have chanted anti-India slogans and at times targeted Indian diplomatic facilities.
The most recent high-profile case involved the sudden cancellation of Indian women’s cricket team vice-captain Smriti Mandhana’s wedding to Indore-based music composer Palash Muchhal. Their highly anticipated nuptials were called off just days before the ceremony, leaving fans and media alike stunned. Such last-minute cancellations, once a rarity in Indian culture, are now becoming more frequent. While the reasons for each cancellation may vary, one common thread that has emerged is the profound impact of social media on personal relationships and public life. In this article, we will explore why weddings are being cancelled in India and abroad, and how social media, shifting societal norms, and evolving personal aspirations are contributing to this growing trend.
The divorce of Kim Kardashian and Kanye West is one of the most publicized examples of how social media can affect a celebrity marriage. Throughout their relationship, Kanye often made headlines with his controversial tweets, some of which included very personal and intimate details about their marriage. His outbursts on Twitter, including attacks on Kim’s family and her relationships, added public pressure on the couple and may have contributed to their separation. The constant media attention, fuelled by social media, seemed to exacerbate the couple’s issues, with their every move being dissected and discussed by millions.
The divorce between Amber Heard and Johnny Depp was filled with public allegations and counter-allegations of abuse. Social media played a huge role in the dissemination of their very personal issues, as both sides used it to defend their positions or to attack the other. The #MeToo movement was brought into the fray, with both sides leveraging public sentiment and social media platforms to garner support. The trial and media coverage, fueled by social media platforms, likely exacerbated the toxicity of the relationship and contributed to the breakdown of their marriage.
Justin Bieber and Hailey Baldwin’s relationship has been publicized largely through social media. The couple faced backlash after their quick engagement and marriage, with many speculating about the true nature of their relationship. Social media users were quick to point out every flaw, every moment of perceived drama, which undoubtedly added pressure to their union. While the couple has since defended their relationship on platforms like Instagram, the intense public scrutiny and online rumors certainly put stress on their bond.
Similarly, the divorce of Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston was partially influenced by the intense media scrutiny they faced as a couple. In the 2000s, they were considered one of Hollywood’s most “perfect” couples, and the media spotlight on their every move added significant stress.
Role of Social Media
Social media has revolutionized the way people interact, share their lives, and form relationships. Platforms like Instagram, Facebook, Twitter, and now more prominently, TikTok, have created a new type of public intimacy. While these platforms have facilitated communication, they have also introduced new pressures, particularly in the realm of relationships.
For many individuals, the pressure to present a perfect life online has created unrealistic expectations for both romantic relationships and weddings. The wedding day, traditionally one of the most important events in an individual’s life, has become a spectacle—an opportunity to showcase wealth, beauty, and perfection. Social media encourages the sharing of every detail, from pre-wedding rituals to honeymoon photos, and this public scrutiny can sometimes backfire.
In the case of Smriti Mandhana and Palash Muchhal, rumors circulated on social media about differences in opinion and compatibility. Once something is posted online, it can quickly spiral out of control. If the public reacts negatively, it can lead to stress and strain on the couple, sometimes even causing a breakup or a last-minute cancellation. The fear of public judgment and the pressure to conform to idealized standards of marriage and love are some of the reasons why weddings are being called off in today’s world.
Moreover, social media can also amplify personal insecurities, especially when comparing one’s life to the curated, picture-perfect lives of others. In a culture where matchmaking and family approval play crucial roles, exposure to online opinions can create anxiety, leading individuals to second-guess their decisions.
Changing Attitudes Toward Marriage and Expectations
Historically, marriage in India has been viewed as a sacred institution. Arranged marriages, where families take the lead in choosing a partner for their child, have long been the norm. Over time, however, the concept of “love marriages” has gained prominence. While arranged marriages still dominate, the rise of dating apps and greater social acceptance of romantic relationships has changed the way people approach marriage. Many young people now place more importance on personal choice, compatibility, and shared values over traditional considerations like caste, religion, or family background.
This shift in mindset has made it harder for some couples to follow through with weddings when they realize that they may not be compatible. Pressure from parents, extended families, and even society at large to “settle down” can force people to rush into marriages they are not ready for. These unrealistic expectations about how a wedding should proceed—based on societal pressures and the fear of judgment—can lead to a last-minute cancellation.
Additionally, the concept of marriage as a lifelong commitment is being reevaluated, especially by the younger generation. Many are questioning the idea of “forever” in the face of changing careers, goals, and personal ambitions. Young women, in particular, are increasingly pursuing careers, education, and travel, often prioritizing these aspirations over traditional family structures. The concept of settling down may feel more like a restriction than a natural progression, leading some individuals to rethink their decision when faced with the societal pressure to marry.
The Influence of Reality TV and Celebrity Culture
Indian society is no stranger to the influence of celebrity culture, and weddings have become a key part of that spectacle. From Bollywood stars to cricket icons, weddings are often covered in the media, giving rise to an idealized version of matrimonial bliss. These celebrity weddings are highly publicized, and the “fairytale” narrative is projected onto ordinary people, creating pressure to meet these high expectations.
However, reality shows and celebrity scandals have exposed the darker side of these highly publicized weddings. Many celebrity marriages, including some highly anticipated ones, have ended in divorce or separation. The notion of a “perfect wedding” is often shattered by the reality of personal differences, incompatible lifestyles, or external pressures.
For some, the very idea of a wedding, especially when surrounded by media attention, becomes an overwhelming ordeal. Public figures like Smriti Mandhana and Palash Muchhal, whose personal lives are under constant media scrutiny, might feel that the pressures of their high-profile wedding are too much to handle. This can lead to decisions to call off the wedding, especially if one or both parties feel that they are not ready to enter into such a public commitment.
Financial Pressures
The cost of weddings in India has skyrocketed in recent years, and many couples find themselves struggling to meet the financial demands of hosting a lavish wedding. The rise of destination weddings, which often involve expensive travel, venues, and elaborate ceremonies, has added another layer of pressure on couples and families. Some couples, overwhelmed by the financial strain, may opt to call off the wedding altogether or delay it until they are in a more financially stable position.
This financial pressure, combined with the increasing expectations of perfection from family members, friends, and social media followers, can make it difficult for couples to proceed with a wedding that they may not be emotionally or financially prepared for. In many cases, they may decide to cancel the wedding before it happens to avoid further embarrassment or to preserve their financial security.
Divorce Culture
India, traditionally a country with a strong emphasis on marriage as a lifelong bond, is witnessing a rise in the number of divorces, particularly in urban areas. This shift in attitudes is another factor contributing to the cancellation of weddings. With divorce rates rising, many individuals are now more cautious about entering into marriage, especially if they are unsure about the long-term compatibility of their partner.
The fear of divorce and the social stigma attached to it may prompt individuals to call off their wedding before it even begins. This is especially true for those who have been previously married or who have experienced failed relationships. In a society where failure is often viewed negatively, avoiding the potential for a failed marriage by calling off the wedding beforehand is seen by some as a safer option.
Cultural Expectations
Family expectations remain one of the most powerful forces in Indian marriages. In many cases, families take on the responsibility of organizing and financing the wedding, leading to the imposition of cultural norms, expectations, and sometimes even forced decisions. While many individuals are choosing to marry for love, the influence of family, societal approval, and the desire to meet traditional standards can sometimes overwhelm the couple, leading to a last-minute cancellation.
This phenomenon is often seen in situations where one party feels coerced into a marriage due to familial pressure, only to back out when the weight of those expectations becomes too much to bear. In such cases, the cancellation may be seen as an act of defiance or self-preservation.
Complex Blend
Weddings in India are no longer just an affair of love and commitment; they have become a complex blend of societal pressures, personal aspirations, family dynamics, and external influences like social media and celebrity culture. The reasons for wedding cancellations are multifaceted, ranging from the impact of social media scrutiny and changing personal values to financial pressures and the fear of a failed marriage.
As India continues to evolve socially and culturally, the idea of marriage is also transforming. More couples are opting for authenticity, compatibility, and personal freedom over traditional expectations and public performances. While wedding cancellations may be seen as a break from tradition, they are also a reflection of the changing priorities of a new generation—one that values personal well-being over societal approval.
Ultimately, the cancellation of a wedding is not just a personal decision, but a broader reflection of the challenges and complexities of modern relationships in India.
