Page 34 - English Tehelka Issue 3&4
P. 34

politics




                 • Change of guard Justice Gogoi will take
                                                                                                                     How Dogmatic Marxiststs are
                 over as CJI after Justice Misra retires

                 a legal battle in the HC and the SC.
                 The CBI has even arrested a former                                                                  Obscuring Future of Left in India
                 judge in the bribery scandal per-
                 taining to the case which was aimed
                 at ‘fixing’ judges. The CBI has applied
                 to the SC to investigate a sitting
                 judge of Allahabad High Court. The                                                                  CPI(M) leaders must acknowledge that it isn’t a national but a regional party that cannot make an
                 case was heard by a bench headed                                                                    impact on its own. Joining hands with the Congress, a stronger and secular party, is the only solution
                 by the CJI and the Prasad Medical                                                                   in the interest of Left politics in the country, vivashwan singh writes
                 received relief from it.
                   The case became controversial
                 and in November last year Justice
                 Chelameswar ordered, in response   Neither of the two       pointed to the post of CJI by super-                       ladimir Lenin once said,   the first time in nearly 60 years.   Yechury and Karat represent the
                 to a petition by Advocate Kamini                            seding senior judges. At that time,                        “The idea that we can   In July 2008, Prakash Karat, ig-  interests of the party’s West Ben-
                 Jaiswal  that  the  case  should  be   cases questioning    the executive was making appoint-                          never  make  compro-  noring the opposition of Bengal   gal and Tripura, and Kerala units
                 heard by another five-judge bench   the CJI has yet         ments and had a say in the affairs                         mises  and  changes  of   unit and defying the advice of party   respectively, the states where the
                 of senior judges. The CJI intervened                        of the Supreme Court. However,                    V tack  during  this  war      patriarch Jyoti Basu, withdrew sup-  CPM still has a presence. The Kerala
                 and ordered that he alone was the   received treatment      when we see Supreme Court judge-                  (Bolshevik revolution) is childish.” He  port from the UPA government. This  party unit’s opposition to Yechury is
                 Master of Roster, and hence, only he   to the satisfaction   ments in Keshvanand Bharati Case                 had pointed that there were “cases of  reckless decision not only failed to   explained by the fact that the UDF
                 could assign cases to benches.                              or in Golaknath Case that the basic               exceptional difficulty and complex-  topple the UPA at the Centre, but   headed by the Congress is the only
                   SC lawyer Prashant Bhushan   of the complaining           structure of the Constitution cannot              ity, when the greatest efforts were   also gave a heavy blow to the Left   viable alternative to the CPI(M) in
                 has  demanded  an  in-house  in -                           be touched and fundamental rights                 necessary for a proper assessment   parties, particularly the CPM. In the   Kerala; Karat’s anti-Congress ap-
                 quiry into the conduct of the CJI by   parties              cannot be curtailed by Parliament,                of the actual character of this or that  2009 General Election, the Congress  proach makes perfect sense to Ker-
                 five senior-most judges including                           we find examples of independence                  ‘compromise.’ “Lenin also points out                         ala legislators. The alignment with
                 the four who had come before the   ingh — wanted the SC not to bar the  of the judiciary. We hardly have any   that the history of the Russian Revo-                       Congress, even if it is for a national
                 media. In his complaint to the five   High Court from hearing the matter.  such examples in the recent past.  lution is full of examples of compro-                        purpose, might be challenging for
                 senior-most judges, Bhushan has   However, this was not accepted by   Will the move of the four judg-         mises carried out by the Bolsheviks,   One misstep taken     the CPI(M) unit in Kerala, because it
                 contended, “The facts and circum-  the court. The motive of petitioners   es help the judiciary to regain its   which he calls “changes of tack”. The   by a rigid general   is difficult to explain joining hands
                 stances relating to the Prasad Edu-  who went to the SC to demand the   ground? This seems unlikely. CPM      Bolsheviks made deals not only with                          with the local principal opponent.
                 cation Trust case show prima facie   investigations is also being doubted.  leader Sitaram Yechury has even   other revolutionary forces but also   secretary 10 years     However, the Kerala unit seems to
                 evidence suggesting that CJI Misra   Petitioner Tehseen Poonawala has   initiated the move to unite the Op-   with bourgeois parties.                                      either ignore or forget that CPI(M)
                 may have been involved in the con-  been disowned by the Congress,   position to propose impeachment            The  Prakash  Karat  and  S  Ra-  ago has led to           is no longer a national player on
                 spiracy of paying illegal gratification  the party he claims allegiance to.   of CJI Misra. JD(U) leader Sharad   machandran Pillai-led ‘no alliance,   near-irrelevance   the political stage. In today’s time,
                 in the case, which at least warrants    Another petitioner BS Lone is re-  Yadav has supported the move.      no understanding with the Con -                              whether its tactical line is to be or
                 a thorough investigation.” He has   portedly close to a BJP leader from   CPI leader D Raja even went to      gress’ line has been approved by   of CPI(M) in Bengal       not to be with the Congress is unlike-
                 also demanded inquiry into few   Mumbai. Both petitioners are being  meet Justice Chelameswar. Nrip-          CPI(M) Central Committee, rejecting   and has reduced        ly to be of much interest, even to the
                 other  charges  of  impropriety   seen to be on the side which does   endra Misra, Principal Secretary        a slightly different formulation ad-                         Congress. While Congress continues
                 against the CJI.              not want an independent probe.     to the Prime Minister, was seen at           vocated by party general secretary   the party to just 9     to have a national footprint, though
                   After the press conference of   The medical scam case is very   the doors of the CJI, who, however,         Sitaram Yechury by a 55-31 vote.  The   seats in Lok Sabha   fast diminishing, the CPI(M) has been
                 four judges, several parleys were   contentious. Bhushan and others   avoided meeting him. These devel-       word ‘understanding’ in the Karat                            reduced to a regional player. Leaving
                 held between the judges and the   are targeting the CJI for not allow-  opments point to a situation where    draft meant to close all possibili-                          aside Kerala, Tripura and West Ben-
                 CJI. Bar Council of India also met   ing probe into the conduct of a sit-  the judiciary is unable to shield itself   ties of an informal or tacit associa-  returned  to  power  with  greater   gal, it will find it difficult to influence
                 the judges and the CJI to resolve the  ting judge of the Allahabad High   from outside interference. It will be   tion with the Congress in the future.   strength while the Left Front’s tally   electoral politics in any other part of
                 matter. It was claimed that the mat-  Court who had previously heard the  really disastrous to have a judiciary   The dogmatism of some comrades   came down from 60 to 24 seats. One  India. Of the three states in which it
                 ter has been resolved. However, it   case. Former Orissa HC Judge IM   which is exposed to interferences      is pushing the future of the party   misstep taken by a dogmatic general  still matters, the CPI(M) is in power
                 does not seem to be so. None of the   Qudussi was arrested by the CBI and  from the executive or the legisla-  into obscurity. They may claim to be   secretary 10 years ago has led to the   in Kerala and Tripura and the main
                 two cases cited above seems to have  released on bail. This is the first time  ture. In India, immunity of judiciary   ideologically astute as compared to   near-irrelevance of the CPM in Ben-  Opposition party in West Bengal in
                 received the treatment to the satis-  that the judiciary has invited crisis   to such interferences is absolutely   Yechury but their decisions say oth-  gal and has reduced the party to just  terms of vote share. Former Kerala
                 faction of the complaining parties.  on its own. During the days of Indira  essential because it is the custodian   erwise. The ideological rigidness of   9 seats in Lok Sabha. It is difficult to   CM and Veteran CPI(M) leader V.S.
                   In the case of Justice Loya’s death,  Gandhi, the executive directly in-  of our Constitution.              the party created history by denying  say whether the party will manage to  Achuthanandan, who is also popu-
                 the two counsels of interveners   tervened and manipulated the apex                                           a third term to Yechury and failing to  secure a single seat from West Ben-  larly referred as the Fidel Castro of
                 — Dushyant Dave and Indira Jais-  court. She got Justice AN Ray ap-       letters@tehelka.com                 send anyone to the Rajya Sabha for   gal in the next general elections.   India, said he is in favour of forming



                                       tehelka / 28 february 2018  34  www.tehelka.com                                                                Tehelka / 28 february 2018  35  www.Tehelka.com



   32-34 Anil Sinha.indd   4                                                                          12/02/18   3:40 PM  35-37 Left Politics.indd   3                                                               12/02/18   2:45 PM
   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39