Page 60 - 31MAR2019E
P. 60

said a person close to the negotiations.
           In June last year too, US President
         Donald Trump had abruptly an-
         nounced a hike in customs duties on
         some steel and aluminium products.
         Responding to this, the Centre had
         decided to levy tariffs on products like
         almonds and apples but its implemen-
         tation was deferred more than five
         times as India hoped to secure a good
         trade deal from the US.
         Why US move?
         The GSP withdrawal came after Trump
         called India a ‘tariff king’, saying that
         the government imposes ‘tremen-
         dously high’ tariffs on American prod-
         ucts. The US government said it did not
         receive any assurance from India that
         it will be given reasonable access to the
         Indian market. Due to preferential tar-
         iffs ranging from a percent to six per-
         cent, the total benefit from the scheme
         was close to $190 million. The scheme   estimates from the Central Statistics   • Trade curbs  The Trump administration
         also ensured non-discriminatory trade   Office point to a slowdown. The GDP   recently notified Congress that it wants to
         practices between the two countries.  growth is projected to have eased to   scrap trade concessions for India
           Commerce Secretary Anup Wad-   6.6 per cent in the October-December
         hawan observed that he wondered,   period. At that level, growth would   benefits under the preference regime.
         “why the US government took this step   have slowed to a seven-quarter low   This will help offset the erosion of the
         despite India working towards a mutu-  and slowest pace of annual growth for   GSP tariff advantage and facilitate the
         ally beneficial and reasonable trade   the present government in India. The   retentioof their market share in the
         package”. The Commerce Ministry said   cause of concern is the farm sector,   US. If need be, the government could
         the Centre’s deal would have given   which slowed to 2.7 per cent in the   provide some financial support as an
         the US reasonable access to various   last quarter, from a 4.2 per cent pace   emergency measure to these sectors in
         markets like agriculture and animal   in July-September and 4.6 per cent a   the form of export subsidies. In July last
         husbandry along with relaxation in   year earlier. Manufacturing is another   year, India had announced its inten-
         procedures related to telecom testing   cause of concern with growth for the   tion to impose retaliatory tariffs on the
         and tariff cuts in information and com-  sector pegged at 6.7 per cent, weaker   US.
         munications technology (ICT) products   than the 6.9 per cent posted in the sec-  However, India has refrained from
         but on specific terms.           ond quarter and a rapid deceleration   imposing those retaliatory tariffs. With
           India was willing to cut tariffs   from the April-June’s 12.4 per cent.  the preferential benefits being ter-
         on ICT products, where there was a   With tensions mounting at the bor-  minated after a 60-day grace period,
         direct US interest. Any other reduc-  ders, the economy heading for a period   there should be no trade-related rea-
         tion could help a third party, especially   of uncertainty and now US threatening   son for India to hold back these tariffs.
         China.  India had adequate warning   withdrawal preferential status, it’s not   Overall, termination of India’s benefits
         that the United States could terminate   a good news because the sword hang-  under the generalized system of pref-
         important trade preferences to the   ing over India’s preferential access for   erences presages a bumpy road ahead
         country. The US is reportedly unhappy   its exports to the US market has finally   in bilateral trade relations between
         with India because India’s recent   fallen.                      India and the US. The best course for
         rules on e-commerce have inconven-                               both countries would be to continue
         ienced Walmart and Amazon, both US   Options available           to talk and explore ways of resolving
         companies.                       So, what are the options available to   their trade issues and for Indian policy
           The US decision would further   India? India needs to enhance cost   makers is to keepthe US engaged.
         impact Indian economy because    competitiveness in sectors likely to
         India’s economy is slowing. The latest   be adversely affected by the loss of      letters@tehelka.com



                                        Tehelka / 31 march 2019  60  www.Tehelka.com
   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65