Page 34 - 15MAR2020E
P. 34

Yogi govt takes ordinance



      route to recover damages





      Move comes after both the Supreme Court and the High Court pulled up the state government over
      non-existence of any law for putting posters at prominent locations of Lucknow displaying details of
      anti-CAA protesters for allegedly damaging public and private properties, reports mudit mathur


               ogi Adityanath-led  BJP   zance of government’s action and called   through banners. The banners came up
               government in the Uttar   it to defend it. The bench heardsubmis-  at a major roadside with personal details
               Pradesh has now promul-  sions of Advocate General Raghavendra   of more than 50 persons of those accused
               gated an ordinance with an   Singh and passed a detailed order di-  of vandalism during protest in the month
      Y aim to overcome shocks of      recting the UP government to remove   of December, 2019. The poster seek com-
      frequent rebukes from Supreme Court   forthwith such posters and hoardings   pensation from the accused persons and
      and High Court. Both the courts pulled   displayed along the roadsides and prom-  further to confiscate their property, if
      up the government over non-existence   inent crossings of the state’s capital con-  they failed to pay compensation.
      of any law for putting posters and hoard-  taining the names and addresses of anti-  The High Court also directed the gov-
      ings  on  the roadside  and prominent   CAA protesters, including a former IPS   ernment to submit a compliance report
      crossings of Lucknow displaying pictures   officer and many human rights activists.   before the court on or before March 16,
      and addresses of protesters for allegedly   Drawing suo moto public interest   2020.
      damaging public and private proper-  writ proceedings at its own, the High   The Yogi government did not relent
      ties in violence during anti-Citizenship   Court puts the simple question about the   to court’s directives and immediately
      Amendment Act (CAA) protests.    legitimacy of the display of photographs,   challenged High Court’s orders before
        The chief justice of Allahabad High   name and address of certain persons by   a vacation bench of Supreme Court but
      Court Justice Govind Mathur and Justice   the district administration and police   the court though referred the matter to
      Ramesh Sinha took the suomotu cogni-  administration of the city of Lucknow   a larger bench and decline to stay the
   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39