Page 49 - English Tehelka Issue 3&4
P. 49

foreign affairs







 So why should India still be wor-  and again when he had to blame his
 ried about what goes on beyond its   own failures on the drunken mili-
 Western borders? For an answer to   tary General , another Field Marshal,
 this, one must first try and understand   Yahaya Khan, after the defeat of the
 how instability in Pakistan affects us.   Pakistani Army and the creation of
 The fact is that even if Pakistan were   Bangladesh.
 to offer a merger with India, India will   Almost all of these — Bhutto
 almost certainly not accept it— leav-  despite his threat of “a thousand year
 ing that country’s establishment to   war” and Nawaz Sharif despite his
 continue to battle with “sandy mounds   acquiescence in the Kargil opera-
 where snakes abide.” For that very   tion with General Pervez Musharraf
 reason, India does not want a destabi-  — were men who sought to resolve
 lized Pakistan in its neighborhood. A   tensions with India. But they were
 stable Pakistan, even as an enemy, suits   upstaged as soon as they were about
 India more than a friendly but troubled   to succeed.
 Pakistan. Balkanization of Pakistan is   Ironically, the man who came
 the last thing that suits India’s security   closest to resolving the seemingly in-
 concerns. India does not want boxful of   tractable India-Pakistan conflict was
 snakes in its lap. It would rather leave   an army General, President Pervez
 ‘the uniformed’ snake charmers across   Musharraf, who nearly pulled it off
 the border to deal with those snakes.  on Kashmir with his original talk of
 Which is why Doval seems always   “out of the box” solutions. I can never
 to keep a close watch on the situation   forget the way he spoke about the
         problem, and it sounded and probably
 Islamic or a Jehadi Islamist  state? Is it   • security matters National Security Advisor   was so honest: “We say resolve Kashmir  just political and economic but even   • no greetings The BSF didn’t exchange sweets
 India’s problem   Jinnah’s Pakistan with emphasis on   Ajit Doval recently met his Pakistani counterpart   according to our approach. You say   cultural. Most of these countries, like   and greetings with Pakistani Rangers at
 with Pakistan is not   constitutional secularism — the August   Lt Gen Nasser Khan Janjua (retd) in Thailand  ‘We must resolve it our way.’ Therefore,   Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Iran, Afghanistan,   Attari-Wagah border this Republic Day
         there is no go. So, lets do so, let us do
 11, 1948 speech being iconic — or is it
                                         Bangladesh, etc., happen to be in the
 that one is a secular   the Pakistan of the fundamentalist   something different. Let is us think out   Islamic block. And yet India’s trade and
 state and the   Mullahs insisting on Shariat laws as the  liberated intellectuals like Hassan Nisar   of the box.” That was as original as it    cultural ties with  all these countries   sion that his party continued to believe
                                         have traditionally been strong and have  in ‘Akhand Bharat’ which includes the
         can get.
 only constitution ? There is an educated  — too bold to be tolerated even in India.
 other a theocratic   middle class in Pakistan which is in   And there are quite a few others, some   But may be, the Indian government   been on the upswing. For that matter,   present day Pakistan, Bangledesh, Ne-
 one. India enjoys   no way different from or inferior to its   operating from overseas but most from   and the Pakistan army working behind  even Israel is a Jewish state but  while   pal, Myanmar and parts of Afghanistan.
 counterpart in India. They love cinema.  the Pakistani soil itself, telling their
                                                                            India’s real problem with Pakistan is
                                         maintaining its principled stance on
         the shoulders of Musharraf ensured
 excellent ties with   They love English. They love Bollywood   countrymen to rise above bigotry and   that the problem wasn’t as simple as   Palestine, India has always had sound   the deliberate choice Pakistani estab-
 see reality as the global community
 and they WANT TO LOVE India. But
                                                                          lishment continues to make in keeping
         that. If that is true, that indeed is a great  bilateral ties with it. This was so even
 many theocratic   they are annoyed with India for not   sees it. And there are cerebral politi-  pity and a great tragedy. For what-  when New Delhi did not have formal   it a security state, with the entire focus
 countries  standing by them against enemies in   cians like Hina Rabbani.   ever else Pervez Musharraf may have   diplomatic ties with Tel Aviv.  being on Pakistan becoming a strong
 their own country — the fundamental-
                                            Thus, India’s issue with Pakistan
                                                                          military power to ward off “the threat
 But then, waiting at the end of it
         been,  his proposal for a solution of the
 ists. And there are the ‘lal topiwalas’ —   all is the army. You can’t move a leaf   Kashmir tangle was not only original   has nothing to do with our neigh-  of Hindu hegemony in the region”. The
 the passionate ideological equivalents   without permissions from the army   but also, for a Pakistani Head of State, a   bours being a theocratic state. Nor is   security-state syndrome translates into
 within Pakistan — not because he   of the old-world Mullahs , the Zaid   headquarters. You must understand   very courageous one. And perhaps the   there any substance in the impression   reducing democracy to an object of rid-
 wants to destabilize conditions there   Hamids who function more as mouth-  Pakistan: it’s not like India  or England.   only solution possible — turning the   deliberately spread across Pakistan by   icule and something which a patron-
 but, on the contrary, he does not want   pieces of the Inter-Services Intelligence  Here , the army has all the power and   Line-of-Control into a line of irrel-  its Mullah-military establishment that   izing army brooks only as a concession
 instability there to begin to spill over   (ISI), the Army Inter-Services Public   the politicians all the responsibility   evance and virtually bringing the two   India has never really been reconciled   to the political class. If Jinnah wanted
 into our homes.   Relations (ISPR) than as representatives  and blame. In Pakistan, democracy   Kashmirs together without either India  to the reality of Pakistan as a state and   Pakistan to be a liberal secular democ-
 of Pakistan’s educated middle class.  is merely a camouflage to cover the   or Pakistan having to surrender their   harbours secret ambitions to annex it.   racy with a tolerant Muslim majority,
 So what is happening in Pakistan?   Then there is also the liberated me-  army’s sins. The politicians know it, and   prestige or stakes. But that was the last   Ironically, the propaganda that there   that ideal was buried with him as Liaqat
 As a state, it is hard even to find out   dia — the cool and composed though   they generally play along. But there   time the two countries ever got close to  is a strong communal Hindu lobby in   Ali Khan quickly tied his country’s
 if there is a Pakistan out there. There   slightly angry Rauf Klasras, the Amir   are times when they speak out, like   lasting peace.  India represented by the RSS and its   destiny to the Mullah-military regime.
 are several. And they keep changing   Mateens, the liberated intellectuals like  Nawaz Sharif has been doing since his   India’s problem with Pakistan is   political arm, the BJP, fell flat on its face   This, obviously should be Pakistan’s
 their political, psychological and even   Pervez Hoodhbhoys, and the genuinely  departure from the PM’s office. Zulfikar   not that one is a secular state and the   with Atal Behari Vajpayee becoming   internal affair and India should have no
 administrative colours every other day.  impartial and objective journalists like   Ali Bhutto did so briefly when he had   other a theocratic one. There are so   the first Indian Prime Minister to pay   problem in dealing with it.
 No one in Pakistan seems to know what  Ejaz Haider or intellectuals like Parvez   to “extinguish” Field Marshal General   many other theocratic countries with   an official visit to Minar-e-Pakistan as a
 their country stands for. Is it a liberal    Darvesh. Then there are angry but   Ayub Khan post-Tashkent Agreement,   whom India enjoys excellent ties — not  symbolic gesture to dispel the impres-     letters@tehelka.com
 Tehelka / 28 february 2018  48  www.Tehelka.com  Tehelka / 28 february 2018  49   www.Tehelka.com

 47-49 Bains Spectravision.indd   2-3                                                                 12/02/18   3:49 PM
   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54