Page 34 - 31DEC2018E
P. 34

HARYANA


         Associate Journal                                                                                                                               • Double trouble  Haryana’s ex-CM Bhupinder   ed Solanki on the recommendations
                                                                                                                                                                                            Haryana government had suspend-
                                                                                                                                                         Hooda is in trouble for re-allotting a plot to AJL
                                                                                                                                                                                          of the Chief Administrator of HSVP, J
         case returns to                                                                                                                                 gress high command for re-allotment   Ganeshan and AK Singh, Commissioner
                                                                                                                                                                                          of the HSVP. Ganeshan has been shifted
                                                                                                                                                                                          from the department. Both Ganeshan
                                                                                                                                                         of the plot. Hooda re-allotted the plot
                                                                                                                                                                                          and  Singh have described Solanki’s
                                                                                                                                                         at an old rate of 1982 although with in-
         haunt Bhupinder                                                                                                                                 terest. In the meantime, Manohar Lal   action in re-allotment of show-rooms
                                                                                                                                                                                          as illegal.
                                                                                                                                                         became the chief minister and the gov-
                                                                                                                                                         ernment referred the case to the State
                                                                                                                                                                                            Solanki, however, got stay against
                                                                                                                                                                                          his  suspension  from  Punjab  and
                                                                                                                                                         Vigilance Bureau which registered a
         Singh Hooda                                                                                                                                     case against Hooda. After that, the gov-  Haryana Govt. arguing that his ac -
                                                                                                                                                                                          tion was on basis of the letter writ -
                                                                                                                                                         ernment transferred the case to CBI
                                                                                                                                                         and recently, the Haryana Governor,
                                                                                                                                                                                          ten by the headquarter. However, on
                                                                                                                                                         Satyadev Narayan Arya, had accorded
                                                                                                                                                         sanction for prosecution of Hooda in   the recommendations of Ganeshan,
                                                                                                                                                                                          showrooms in question have been
                                                                                                                                                         the case which is mandatory according  resumed by the department thus sav-
         Bhupinder Hooda had described the case as totally politically                                                                                   to the new law as Hooda being a public  ing  twenty  crores  as  showrooms
         motivated adding that plot was re-allotted by charging interest,                                                                                servant. It is alleged that Bhupinder Sin-  were re-allotted at the old price of
                                                                                                                                                         gh Hooda had re-allotted the plot at Rs
                                                                                                                                                                                           one crore whereas, the market price of
         writes PAWAN KUMAR BANSAL                                                                                                                       fifty-nine lakhs where the market value
                                                                                                                                                         at that time was  Rs. twenty-two crores
                     hile Haryana govern-  able. A copy of  746 issue of the paper,   still no action has been taken.      When approached for comments,   thus causing huge loss to the exchequer.   Six out of the seven
                     ment has moved with   dated 26th May 2018 was displayed on   Dalal told Tehelka, “Prime plot was    Rajiv Jain, media adviser of chief min-  Moreover, even the legal opinion was   stories of the building
                     jet  speed  in  what  is   the notice board.         allotted for running newspaper but             ister Manohar Lal told that he was not   sought by the government was not in
                     known  as  Associate   This exposed the double standard of  instead publishing any newspaper, the   aware of the facts of the case and was   favour of re-allotment.  have been rented
         W Journal case (AJL) for         the Haryana government in dealing the  building had been given on rent against   busy in some social function. However,   Bhupinder Hooda had described
         registering a case against former Har-  similar cases. While Bhupinder Hooda   rules. During the year 2007-08, when   Raman Malik, party’s spokesman told   the case as totally politically motivat-  out to India Bulls, a
         yana chief minister Bhupinder Hooda   is bete noire of BJP and had launched   I  in my capacity of the chairperson of   that although he was not aware of the   ed adding that plot was re-allotted by   real estate company
         for re-allotting a plot to AJL, for publi-  a campaign in the state against vari-  the estimate committee of Haryana    facts of the case at this moment, he    charging interest.
         cation of a newspaper, it is maintaining  ous acts of commission and commis-  Assembly had visited the site and found   assured to talk with the officer con-                     owned by Narender
         a studied silence in a similar case of al-  sion of Haryana government, headed   that no newspaper was being published   cerned He, however, assured that the   Gurugram showroom re-allotment   Gehlot and Sammer
         lotment of a prime plot allotted to Jan   by Manohar Lal, Haryana government   from there. Also, the site was rented to   government will get the issue exam-  case
         Sewa Trust in Gurugram for setting up   has a soft corner for Om Parkash Chau-  India Bulls company. Dalal demanded   ined and definitely take action accord-  In the AJL case, the Haryana govern-  Gehlot at a hefty
         high-tech printing press for publishing  tala for obvious reasons. Firebrand   that Haryana government should im-  ing to law.                  ment initially ordered a probe by the   amount of rent
         newspaper. Krishan Kumar setter of the  Congress MLA Karan Dalal, who in his   mediately resume the plot for violations                         State Vigilance and later the case was
         trust registered at Delhi is stated to be a  capacity of the chairperson of the esti-  of term and conditions of the allotment.  What is AJL case?  referred to CBI for investigations, but in
         close relative of former Haryana chief   mate committee of the Haryana assem-  Ran  Singh  Maan,  spokesman  of   Associated Journals Limited publisher   a similar case which is more serious in   today is around  Twenty crores. Highly
         minister, Om Prakash Chautala.   bly had investigated the matter a dec-  Haryana Pradesh Congress Commit-       of newspaper National Herald was al-  nature, Estate officer of Haryana Shahri  placed sources told Tehelka that PR Dev,
           Tehelka investigations reveal that   ade ago and recommended appropriate  tee told Tehelka that in fact, the gov-  lotted a plot measuring 3360  square   Vikas Pradhikaran (HSVP) Gurugram,   DG Vigilance is sitting over file seeking
         no printing press is functioning and   action in accordance with the law, but   ernment needs to take action against   meters by Haryana Urban Develop-  Mukesh Solanki, had re-allotted three   his permission for inquiring the matter.
         no newspaper is being printed from                               Jan Sewa Trust for using the property          ment Authority which has been now   showrooms at Gurugram which were   There is feeling in official circles that
         the building constructed on the plot   No printing press is      as commercial whereas, it was allotted         named as Haryana Sahari Vikas Pra-  resumed in 1998 for non-payment in   this case should also be referred to CBI
         in the prime location of Udyog Vihar,                            for publication of the newspaper. Maan         dhikaran in 1982 at Panchkula. Ac -  2018 at old price of 1998. The Haryana   which is inquiring Associate Journals
         Gurugram. In fact, six out of the seven   functioning and no     further told that the Haryana Urban            cording to the terms of allotment, the   government is not giving permission   Ltd case as both are of similar nature.
         stories of the building have been rented   newspaper is being    Development Authority Act clearly pro-         company was to start construction   to the Vigilance Bureau for the probe.   Role of office of Chief Minister is also
         out to India Bulls, a real estate company                        vides for such a definite step for resum-      within six months and complete it in   Solanki who was earlier suspended has  under cloud in the case as the represen-
         owned by Narender Gehlot and Sam-  printed from the              ing estate property and action should          two years. When AJL failed to construct  got stay on his suspension from Punjab  tation of affected party for considera-
         mer Gehlot at a hefty amount of rent.                            have been dully taken.                         the building H.U.D.A, had resumed it in  and Haryana High court on the ground  tion of their case for re-allotment was
         Only a skeleton office has been set up   building constructed       Talking about Associate Journals            1992 and AJL ’s appeal was also turned   that he had re-allotted the showrooms   forwarded to H.S.V.P,authorities by the
         on its sixth floor where few employees   on the plot in the      Limited case, Maan told that discrimi-         down by the department in 1995.  on directions of senior officers.  office of C.M ignoring the fact that party
         were present watching television. Even                           nation has been done by selecting for            Meanwhile, an appeal was made to   This is more serious as the party   had lost case in various courts.Rajesh
         the copy of the weekly newspaper,   prime location               adverse action and thereafter lodg-            then chief minister Bhupinder Hooda   concerned has lost the case in courts.   Khullar,P.S. of C.M, told that he was duty
         Jansandesh, which the trust publishes   of Udyog Vihar,          ing of F.I.R ignoring the precious role        in his capacity as chairman of H.U.D.A.   Solanki told Tehelka that he had done   bound to forward any representation
         was not available in the office, whereas,                        played by National Herald during the           Hooda took over as chief minister in   it on the basis of a letter written by the   received by him.
         about twenty newspapers were avail-  Gurugram                    freedom struggle.                              2005 and he was pressurized by Con-  Head office (copy of letter attached).      LETTERS@TEHELKA.COM



                                      TEHELKA / 31 DECEMBER 2018  34  WWW.TEHELKA.COM                                                                 TEHELKA / 31 DECEMBER 2018  35  WWW.TEHELKA.COM


   34-35 Pawan Kumar Bansal.indd   2                                                               12/14/2018   9:25:43 PM  34-35 Pawan Kumar Bansal.indd   3                                                     12/14/2018   9:25:50 PM
   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39