Page 39 - 30NOV2018E
P. 39

OPINION                                                                                           JUDICIARY





 When democracy starts   instances in the recent past where
           There have been several other
 relying more on judiciary  cases are taken up arbitrarily “in public
         interest” while serious cases remain-
         ing pending for years together. In one
 Recent instances showed that Supreme Court took up many    recent instance, a group of policemen
         accused of killing members of a par-
 SPOTLIGHT  cases arbitrarily “in public interest” while serious cases are still    ticular section of society in Muzaffarna-
         gar were convicted and sentenced after
 biting the dust
 VIPIN PUBBY  a gap of 31 years!
           In another case picked up by the
 udiciary is the guardian of our   provide details of the price of the fighter   courts suo moto, the Punjab and
 constitution and the last hope   aircraft from Rafale “in a sealed enve-  Haryana High Court had been spend-
 for the citizens seeking redressal  lope”. There is no doubt that the deal has   ing hours of its time over scores of
 Former resident editor   of their grievances. It continues   kicked up a major storm and there are al-  dates to question the functioning of the
 of The Indian Express,    to command huge respect but   legations of nepotism and favouritism in   Chandigarh International Airport. The
 Vipin Pubby is a senior   J certain recent actions and    finalising the deal. The sudden decision to   court had been lambasting the airlines
 journalist based in                    directives have raised questions    purchase 36 state-of-art fighter aircraft   for not starting flights, has been asking
 Chandigarh. He can             over it going beyond its jurisdiction   and to facilitate a  30,000 crore contract   some of the airlines to better shut-
 be contacted at   and encroaching into the domain of the   in favour of Anil Ambani surely reeks of   down and even threatening to order
 vipinpubby@gmail.  other two pillars of democracy.  a scandal.
 com. The views    There have also been instances of the   The government has been on the
 expressed are personal  government abdicating its responsibility   back foot and had been stonewalling the   About three    Experts also pointed out that those who  hours. It would have made good sense
 or shifting it to the judiciary as in the case  details about the deal on the grounds that   like to drink don’t make up their minds   if the order was to all educational
 of its stand on the abolition of Article 377   the price at which the agreement was   crore cases are   after coming across a shop or getting   institutions, including colleges and
 when it left the decision to “the wisdom   aimed was a “secret”. It had also been tak-  pending in various   attracted by an advertisement. Surely   universities, to start working hours
 of the court” but such instances are rare.   ing the plea that disclosing details about   there were other ways to curb the men- with the national anthem. And why not
 The judiciary, on the other hand, had   its capabilities and weapon systems   courts of the country,   ace than the diktat to remove shops   all government departments where
 been taking up issues of governance with  would compromise national security and   including about one   and hoardings from the highways. Sub-  ministers and bureaucrats should have
 increasing frequency and that too at the   safety.   sequently, the directive was taken back  been directed to stand in attention at
 level of Supreme Court and various High   Congress is seeking to make it a major   crore before the   and it is back to business as usual.  the opening of office hours.
 Courts.  plank to take on the Modi Government   higher judiciary, for   Similarly, the directive to compul-  Possibilities were endless but the
 This is when three crore cases are   in the general elections did next year.   sorily play the national anthem before   court directive picked up only the place
 pending in various courts of the country,   The government is also fighting with its   several years, even   the screening of a movie was a bizarre   where people go for entertainment.
 including about one crore before the   back to the wall and has refused to make   decades  move. Attempts to find a precedent like  Subsequently, another bench diluted
 higher judiciary, for several years, even   public the details of the deal.  this in another country were futile. It   the directive by saying it was not man-
 decades. Something that is of equal sig-  It is under these circumstances that   could be happening in North Korea but   datory for cinema owners to play the
 nificance is that about 40 per cent of the   the apex court asked the government to   there is no way to cross check.   national anthem.
 posts of judges are lying vacant in high   furnish the price of each fighter aircraft   the closure of the airport. If there are   If the idea behind the order to   One can go on and on citing such
 courts across the country. The number   without disclosing to technical details   questions of violation of laws in such   play the national anthem before the   cases even when the issue of vital pub-
 of cases pending is increasing each year   which could jeopardise the safety and   cases, these are being stretched a bit   screenings were to inculcate the spirit   lic and individual interests are pending.
 with, ironically, the government as the   security of the country.  too much.  of patriotism and nationalism, it was   How can the judiciary, for instance,
 largest litigant.  The highest court has, however, not   Then there is a tendency to hastily   a misplaced idea. There were certain   justify a delay of over 30 years in bring-
 Yet, the higher judiciary revels are   indicated as to how would it come to any   pass directions and then take those   incidents in which people who didn’t   ing to book those responsible for the
 taking up issues arbitrarily and even   conclusion about the correctness of the   back. One such recently the decision   stand up were roughed up by the   attacks on Sikhs in 1984.
 where there is no violation of laws. Very   aircraft prices unless it has comparisons   was to ban liquor shops, advertise-  so-called patriotic people. The court   The judiciary, which recently
 often the judges come out with scath-  to study. Again, does it have the com-  ments and bars from within an area of   apparently wanted all citizens to wear   witnessed the spectacle of four senior-
 ing observations which come out in the   petence to study such a deal with the   500 meters from the highways. This led  nationalism on their sleeves to prove   most judges of Supreme Court to pub-
 media but do not find any place in the   specifications unknown to it. How will it   to the closure of hundreds of shops and  their patriotism.   licly raise their voice against the Chief
 final judgments. Some of these cases are   come to any reasoned conclusion of an   bars and the disruption of thousands of   The Apex court could have done bet-  Justice of India, must look inward and
 too technical and complicated for the   illegal deal. The government too has not   lives. There were reports that guzzlers   ter by implementing the order first in   set some of its priorities right. Citizens
 judiciary to come to any well thought out  taken any stand till the time of this edi-  would take a detour of 500 meters and   Supreme Court, all the high courts and   of the country can’t afford to lose faith
 and reasoned verdict.  tion going to the Press. The Comptroller   then get liquor to consume in their ve-  the subordinate judiciary and should   in the institution of judiciary.
 Its latest decision to enter the domain   and Auditor General of India would be in   hicles - certainly a worse situation than  have ordered playing of the national
 of the government is the directive to   a far better position to judge the details.  that existed before the court directive.   anthem at the start of their working   LETTERS@TEHELKA.COM



 TEHELKA / 30 NOVEMBER 2018  38  WWW.TEHELKA.COM  TEHELKA / 30 NOVEMBER 2018  39  WWW.TEHELKA.COM


 38-39 Opinion Vipin Pubby.indd   2  11/16/2018   10:37:12 AM  38-39 Opinion Vipin Pubby.indd   3  11/16/2018   10:37:21 AM
   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44