Page 38 - 30NOV2018E
P. 38

OPINION                                                                                                                                                                                                   JUDICIARY





                                       When democracy starts                                                             instances in the recent past where
                                                                                                                           There have been several other
                                       relying more on judiciary                                                         cases are taken up arbitrarily “in public
                                                                                                                         interest” while serious cases remain-
                                                                                                                         ing pending for years together. In one
                                       Recent instances showed that Supreme Court took up many                           recent instance, a group of policemen
                                                                                                                         accused of killing members of a par-
         SPOTLIGHT                     cases arbitrarily “in public interest” while serious cases are still              ticular section of society in Muzaffarna-
                                                                                                                         gar were convicted and sentenced after
                                       biting the dust
         VIPIN PUBBY                                                                                                     a gap of 31 years!
                                                                                                                           In another case picked up by the
                                             udiciary is the guardian of our   provide details of the price of the fighter   courts suo moto, the Punjab and
                                             constitution and the last hope   aircraft from Rafale “in a sealed enve-    Haryana High Court had been spend-
                                             for the citizens seeking redressal  lope”. There is no doubt that the deal has   ing hours of its time over scores of
         Former resident editor              of their grievances. It continues   kicked up a major storm and there are al-  dates to question the functioning of the
         of The Indian Express,              to command huge respect but   legations of nepotism and favouritism in      Chandigarh International Airport. The
         Vipin Pubby is a senior       J certain recent actions and     finalising the deal. The sudden decision to      court had been lambasting the airlines
         journalist based in                            directives have raised questions    purchase 36 state-of-art fighter aircraft   for not starting flights, has been asking
         Chandigarh. He can                     over it going beyond its jurisdiction   and to facilitate a  30,000 crore contract   some of the airlines to better shut-
         be contacted at               and encroaching into the domain of the   in favour of Anil Ambani surely reeks of   down and even threatening to order
         vipinpubby@gmail.             other two pillars of democracy.  a scandal.
         com. The views                  There have also been instances of the   The government has been on the
         expressed are personal        government abdicating its responsibility   back foot and had been stonewalling the   About three                  Experts also pointed out that those who  hours. It would have made good sense
                                       or shifting it to the judiciary as in the case  details about the deal on the grounds that                        like to drink don’t make up their minds   if the order was to all educational
                                       of its stand on the abolition of Article 377   the price at which the agreement was   crore cases are             after coming across a shop or getting   institutions, including colleges and
                                       when it left the decision to “the wisdom   aimed was a “secret”. It had also been tak-  pending in various        attracted by an advertisement. Surely   universities, to start working hours
                                       of the court” but such instances are rare.   ing the plea that disclosing details about                           there were other ways to curb the men- with the national anthem. And why not
                                       The judiciary, on the other hand, had   its capabilities and weapon systems         courts of the country,        ace than the diktat to remove shops   all government departments where
                                       been taking up issues of governance with  would compromise national security and    including about one           and hoardings from the highways. Sub-  ministers and bureaucrats should have
                                       increasing frequency and that too at the   safety.                                                                sequently, the directive was taken back  been directed to stand in attention at
                                       level of Supreme Court and various High   Congress is seeking to make it a major    crore before the              and it is back to business as usual.  the opening of office hours.
                                       Courts.                          plank to take on the Modi Government               higher judiciary, for           Similarly, the directive to compul-  Possibilities were endless but the
                                         This is when three crore cases are   in the general elections did next year.                                    sorily play the national anthem before   court directive picked up only the place
                                       pending in various courts of the country,   The government is also fighting with its   several years, even        the screening of a movie was a bizarre   where people go for entertainment.
                                       including about one crore before the   back to the wall and has refused to make     decades                       move. Attempts to find a precedent like  Subsequently, another bench diluted
                                       higher judiciary, for several years, even   public the details of the deal.                                       this in another country were futile. It   the directive by saying it was not man-
                                       decades. Something that is of equal sig-  It is under these circumstances that                                    could be happening in North Korea but   datory for cinema owners to play the
                                       nificance is that about 40 per cent of the   the apex court asked the government to                               there is no way to cross check.   national anthem.
                                       posts of judges are lying vacant in high   furnish the price of each fighter aircraft   the closure of the airport. If there are   If the idea behind the order to   One can go on and on citing such
                                       courts across the country. The number   without disclosing to technical details   questions of violation of laws in such   play the national anthem before the   cases even when the issue of vital pub-
                                       of cases pending is increasing each year   which could jeopardise the safety and   cases, these are being stretched a bit   screenings were to inculcate the spirit   lic and individual interests are pending.
                                       with, ironically, the government as the   security of the country.                too much.                       of patriotism and nationalism, it was   How can the judiciary, for instance,
                                       largest litigant.                   The highest court has, however, not             Then there is a tendency to hastily   a misplaced idea. There were certain   justify a delay of over 30 years in bring-
                                         Yet, the higher judiciary revels are   indicated as to how would it come to any   pass directions and then take those   incidents in which people who didn’t   ing to book those responsible for the
                                       taking up issues arbitrarily and even   conclusion about the correctness of the   back. One such recently the decision   stand up were roughed up by the   attacks on Sikhs in 1984.
                                       where there is no violation of laws. Very   aircraft prices unless it has comparisons   was to ban liquor shops, advertise-  so-called patriotic people. The court   The judiciary, which recently
                                       often the judges come out with scath-  to study. Again, does it have the com-     ments and bars from within an area of   apparently wanted all citizens to wear   witnessed the spectacle of four senior-
                                       ing observations which come out in the   petence to study such a deal with the    500 meters from the highways. This led  nationalism on their sleeves to prove   most judges of Supreme Court to pub-
                                       media but do not find any place in the   specifications unknown to it. How will it   to the closure of hundreds of shops and  their patriotism.   licly raise their voice against the Chief
                                       final judgments. Some of these cases are   come to any reasoned conclusion of an   bars and the disruption of thousands of   The Apex court could have done bet-  Justice of India, must look inward and
                                       too technical and complicated for the   illegal deal. The government too has not   lives. There were reports that guzzlers   ter by implementing the order first in   set some of its priorities right. Citizens
                                       judiciary to come to any well thought out  taken any stand till the time of this edi-  would take a detour of 500 meters and   Supreme Court, all the high courts and   of the country can’t afford to lose faith
                                       and reasoned verdict.            tion going to the Press. The Comptroller         then get liquor to consume in their ve-  the subordinate judiciary and should   in the institution of judiciary.
                                         Its latest decision to enter the domain   and Auditor General of India would be in   hicles - certainly a worse situation than  have ordered playing of the national
                                       of the government is the directive to   a far better position to judge the details.  that existed before the court directive.   anthem at the start of their working   LETTERS@TEHELKA.COM



                                      TEHELKA / 30 NOVEMBER 2018  38  WWW.TEHELKA.COM                                                                 TEHELKA / 30 NOVEMBER 2018  39  WWW.TEHELKA.COM


   38-39 Opinion Vipin Pubby.indd   2                                                             11/16/2018   10:37:12 AM  38-39 Opinion Vipin Pubby.indd   3                                                    11/16/2018   10:37:21 AM
   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43