Page 50 - 31MAR2019E
P. 50

PMFBY


         disappoints


         Himachal


         farmers



         Ambiguities in the scheme, lack
         of coordination among different
         implementing agencies and
         rejection of claims on frivolous
         grounds has undermined
         the initial enthusiasm of
         agriculturists for the initiative,
         writes komal amit gera


                 he farmers in Himachal   in Narkanda at a height of 9000 feet,   but it started weaning soon when
                 Pradesh, who battle every   whereas it was initially decided to be   the farmers realized that the scheme
                 year with hail storms, cloud   installed at a height of 6500 feet. As a   was launched without the necessary
                 bursts, excess and deficit   result of change in location of monitor-  groundwork and the insurance com-
         T snow fall and other weather    ing station, the weather conditions for   panies were making most of the profit
         vagaries, had high hopes from the Prad-  the apple crop were normal and claims   at the cost of farmers. The table given
         han Mantri Fasal Bima Yojna (PMFBY),   of all 400 farmers of the village were   as below provides a clear picture about
         which was rolled out in January 2016.   disqualified.            the lacklustre progress of PMFBY in
         Three years down the line, they are dis-  The united farmers did not lose   Himachal Pradesh .
         illusioned with the outcome.     hope and lodged a complaint with the   The number of farmers registered a
           Ambiguities in the scheme, lack of   concerned department in state govern-  significant rise; roughly 78 per cent in
         coordination among different imple-  ment, but of no avail. “The officials gave   2017-18 over 2016-17 but in 2018-19, the
         menting agencies (Insurance compa-  us a cold shoulder and advised us to   response has been tepid as the provi-
         nies, banks and government officials)   move the court, for which we have nei-  sional figures reflect that there has been
         and rejection of claims on frivolous   ther resources nor time. So we decided   a considerable decline in the number of
         grounds has undermined the initial    to desist from the insurance cover from   farmers seeking insurance cover.
         enthusiasm of the farmers for the   next season so that we could at least   Though it is mandatory for the loa-
         scheme. The sources in the banking   save our funds drained in premium”,   nee farmers or the Kisan Credit Card
         sector in the state have confirmed that   told Chet Ram. Most of the farmers in   (KCC) holders to avail the crop insur-
         even the loanee farmers are reluc-  Himachal Pradesh shared the same   ance cover under PMFBY yet farmers
         tant to seek insurance cover provided    experience with the crop insurance   have been taking exemption from this
         under PMFBY as they get only a pit-  scheme launched with much fanfare   scheme. The bankers apprised that
         tance as crop insurance .        across India.                   the farmers are apathetic towards the
           Like many other farmers, Chet Ram,   During the year 2018-19, only one   scheme and refuse to take insurance
         a resident of Thanedar, a hinterland   company, Agriculture Insurance Com-  cover. Many of those who took crop
         in district Shimla, got his apple crop    pany of India was assigned the task of   insurance initially, have withdrawn.
         insured in 2016. The crop failed due to   PMFBY in the state. Prior to this, SBI   This is also indicative in the dwindling
         bad weather but all the farmers of his   General Insurance, IFFCO Tokio, ICICI   number of farmers opting for PMFBY
         village were proclaimed as not eligible   General   Insurance, Reliance Insurance   (as shown in the table). The farmers
         for the insurance cover by the con-  also provided crop insurance cover to   are disgruntled over the half-hearted
         cerned insurance company.        the farmers under PMFBY.        implementation of the scheme.
           The effected farmers approached   Himachal Pradesh has approxi-   Sources close to Tehelka apprised
         the officials of the insurance company   mately 8 lakh farmers out of that about   that 62.62 lakh apple trees have been
         in Chandigarh to understand the rea-  4.31 lakh are credit linked.  The state    covered in the state. The claims of
         son for this denial. They learnt that the   has 464254 orchardists in the state.   only those farmers are settled whose
         monitoring station having the instru-  There was a great enthusiasm among   claims are uploaded on the bank portal.
         ment to record weather was installed   farmers when PMFBY was launched   Uploading data  is a tedious task be-



                                        Tehelka / 31 march 2019  50  www.Tehelka.com
   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55