Page 24 - 30JUNE2019E
P. 24

SC orders release of journalist


                   held over social media post





                                           While granting freelance journalist Prashant Kanjia a bail in the
               t a time when the police machin-
               ery in Uttar Pradesh has com-  case of posting a tweet and a Facebook post against UP CM Yogi
               pletely failed to contain alarm-  Adityanath, the court asked the government why was he arrested
               ingly escalating heinous crimes      and under what provisions, reports muDit mathur
      Aagainst minor girls in the entire
      state, it has devised a diversionary strategy to   tweets in the social media.  journalists have not approached the apex court
      please the angry chief minister Yogi Adityanath   The recent arrests of two journalists and a   yet.
      by targeting his critics in media adopting blatant   channel head and sealing of the NOIDA based   The wife of the journalist Jagisha Arora had
      unconstitutional tactics to muzzle the freedom   office of Nation Live channel sparked nation-  challenged the unlawful detention of her hus-
      to express fairly, freely and fearlessly. Uphold-  wide protests against the retaliatory and arbi-  band Prashant Kanojia by Uttar Pradesh Police
      ing Fundamental Rights under Articles 19, 21   trary suo moto police action to please the po-  and subsequently remanding him under judi-
      under the Constitution being non-negotiable a    litical bosses. The arrest of Delhi based journalist   cial custody till 22nd June, 2019 before Supreme
      vacation bench of apex court ordered immedi-  Prashant Kanojia and the editor and head of a   Court through a habeas corpus petition. UP Po-
      ate release of journalist Prashant Kanojia from   NOIDA-based television channel, Nation Live   lice had raided his residence in Delhi without
      judicial custody on bail. “We don’t appreciate his   – Anuj Shukla and Ishika Singh- by the Uttar   adhering to procedure of informing local police
      tweets but he cannot be put behind bars for this,”   Pradesh Police.   and taken away him to Lucknow without any
      opined the bench.                   Prashant has been accused of re-tweeting a   transit remand as an FIR registered against him
        The  vacation bench of Justices In-  post on Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adi-  by a sub-inspector at Hazratganj police station
      dira Banerjee and  Ajay Rastogi observed   tyanath on the social media and the Nation Live   on June 7 night under section 500 IPC and Sec-
      that Kanojia’s arrest and remand were    head and editor have been charged with having   tion 67 of Information Technology Act. The FIR
      illegal and went against personal liberty. The                     disclose offences that the accused made “objec-
      Bench also turns downed the pleas of alterna-  a vacation bench    tionable comments against the Chief Minister
      tive remedy advanced by Additional Solicitor                       and tried to malign his image. Subsequently
      General Vikramajit Banerjee appearing for Uttar   of Justices indira   after detention the investigation officer added
      Pradesh. He submitted since the remand order   banerjee and ajay   more offences under Section 505 of the IPC (for
      have been passed by the Judicial Magistrate in   Rastogi called    spreading rumors) were added and Section 66 of
      the matter, and as such, a habeas corpus petition   kanojia’s arrest as   the IT Act was replaced by Section 67 (vulgarity).”
      under Article 32 petition should not be enter-  ‘excessive’ but made   Prashant Kanojia, who earlier worked with
      tained and alternatively relegate the matter to                    “thewire.in,” had re-tweeted a video clip on his
      High Court. On behalf of Kanojia and his wife   clear that its order   Twitter and Facebook where a woman is seen
      this matter was presented by the advocates Ni-  for his release on bail   speaking to reporters of various media organi-
      tya Ramakrishnan, Shruti Narayan and  Shadan   should not be read as   sations outside the high security CM’s residence,
      Farasat.                           approval of his social          claiming that she had sent a marriage proposal
        The apex court asserted its powers to do                         to Adityanath with whom she had been in regu-
      complete justice in the matter under Article 142   media posts against   lar connected through video chatting for over a
      of the Constitution and entertained the petition   uttar pradesh Cm yogi   year.
      in view of the excessiveness of the action taken   adityanath        The unlawful arrest of Prashant Kanojia re-
      resulting in glaring case of deprivation of lib-                   sulted in wide scale protests and anger all over
      erty. The bench also made it clear that its order is   aired a video on the UP chief minister followed   the country and on social media forums. While
      not to be construed as an approval of his posts/  with a panel discussion on it. The news channel   condemning the police action being high-hand-


                                          tehelka / 30 june 2019  24  www.tehelka.com
   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29