Page 41 - June2018
P. 41

education






                                                                             was yet to be set and also the process
                                                                             of interview, therefore, tentatively
                                                                             I am of the view that the inquiry
                                                                             should have been conducted at much
                                                                             higher level which is now to be con-
                                                                             sidered and decided by this court….”
                                                                               The result of the exam was placed
                                                                             before the court in a sealed cover and
                                                                             it was found that Sushila and Sunita
                                                                             had topped the exam. The single
                                                                             judge ordered, “in the meantime,
                                                                             the declaration of the preliminary
                                                                             examination result is hereby stayed”.
              Dr. Balwinder Sharma and Ms. Sunita   winder Sharma, Registrar (Recruit-  “The registrar recruitment of this
              during the last one year, indicate that   ment) on the basis of preliminary   court is directed to a file affidavit
              the matter requires a deeper probe.  enquiry”.                 stating as to who had handled the
                It has been established that                                 examination papers right from the
              Sharma, the main accused and a   Genesis of the controversy    time it was set till it was distributed
              former registrar of the Punjab and   On March 20, the Haryana Public   in the examination hall and also
              Haryana High Court, allegedly gave   Service Commission advertised 109   disclose the name of the officials who
              the paper to Sunita, who shared it   posts of HCS (judicial branch) for   have been deputed in handling and
              with her friend Sushila. Both Sharma   recruitment to subordinate judicial   printing of the papers officially and
              and Sunita duped several people.   services. Suman, an advocate, applied   whether anybody else entered the
              According to the 2,400-page charge-  for the same and started attending   room where the papers are printed
              sheet filed in the trial court, Sunita,   Jurist Academy in Chandigarh for   without being deputed for the same..”
              through her roommate Ayushi, a   preliminary examination.        After the single judge passed the
              student, procured a SIM in the name   The petitioner and her husband, in   order indicating involvement of
              of a former employee with a tel-  order to elicit truth, started convers-  high and mighty, the members of the
              ecom company. She gave the SIM to   ing with Sushila regarding avail-  recruitment committee approached
              Sharma, who then used it to register   ability of question paper. Somewhere   the acting Chief Justice of Punjab
              with cab aggregators Uber and Ola   around July 16, Sushila told Suman   and Haryana High Court on August
              with fake names. Between January   that she had struck a deal with Sunita   28 itself seeking transfer of the case
              and April 2017, he booked the cab   and disclosed 5-6 questions which   from the single judge.
              twelve times to go from the high   she said would come in the pre-  Suman then moved the Supreme
              court to a temple in Sector 18 temple,   liminary examination. Suman was   Court seeking transfer of her petition.
              near which Sunita stayed.      shocked to realise that all those ques-  The Supreme Court, however, refused
                Sunita reportedly told the SIT that   tions did come in the preliminary   to entertain the transfer petition and
              she procured her secret number in   examination. Sushila had also told   suggested that it can be approached
              the name of Naresh Sharma, who   Suman that no amount of prepara-  after the high court decides the mat-
              sells flowers outside the temple and   tion would help as all the post for the   ter after which Suman withdrew her
              also runs a canteen. Naresh told the   general category have already been   transfer petition. On September 15,
              police that Sunita continuously pes-  booked or sold.          a three-judge bench of the Punjab
              tered him for SIM claiming she didn’t                          and Haryana High Court directed
              have a Chandigarh address. Sunita   Taking serious view of the matter  Chandigarh police to register an FIR
              also got a SIM from autorickshaw   A single judge took note of the mat-  in the matter. On September 18, it
              driver Varinder Kumar registered on   ter and on August 8, summoned the   constituted a three-member SIT and
              Jugnoo auto hiring app by luring him   Registrar-General who informed that   in November, Sunita was arrested
              with the promise of getting a peon’s   an enquiry is being conducted.  from Delhi. The Chandigarh police
              job in the high court. She often used   On August 16, the single judge had   will have to pull up its socks and do
              his service for commuting and also   ordered “Since it is claimed in the pe-  investigations property as it won’t be
              got him to deliver tiffin and fruits to   tition that not only the paper of HCS   able to put chilies in the eyes of the
              Sharma.                        preliminary examination was leaked   Court, as observed by the Punjab and
                The High Court constituted Com-  but it was a whole package involving   Haryana High Court.
              mittee recommended that regular   the main examination which is yet
              enquiry be initiated against Dr. Bal-  to be conducted and for which paper      letters@tehelka.com



                                           Tehelka / 15 june 2018  41  www.Tehelka.com



     40-41 Column Hiteshi.indd   3                                                                      06/06/18   1:22 PM
   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46