Page 26 - June2018
P. 26

er quest for justice con-  Chinmayanad withdrew this case   Ram Naik opposing the withdrawal
                            tinued  against  a  saf-  from the High Court on 16 Febru-  of the pending case of rape and kid-
                            fron-clad, high-profile   ary 2018, believing that the BJP-led   napping against Chinmayanand.
                            powerful politician and   state government will withdraw the   Governor Ram Naik took cogni-
                  H present BJP member of        criminal case against him.    zance of her complaint and wrote a
                   Uttar Pradesh, despite all the ob-  True to his expectations, Chief   letter to the chief minister to review
                   stacles that influenced her way to   Minister Yogi Adityanath kept his   the government’s decision but to no
                   justice.                      promise and issued instructions   avail. The victim filed objections be-
                     The issuance of bailable war-  to law and justice department to   fore the court too.
                   rant against Swami Chinmayanand   withdraw prosecution in the case   Considering facts and circum-
                   by the chief judicial magistrate of   against Chinmayanad soon after   stances including material pro-
                   Shahjhanpur, Shikha Pradhan, in an   visiting Mumukshu Ashram situ-  duced before it after investigations,
                   alleged rape and kidnapping case   ated at Shajhanpur on 25 February.   the court rejected the government’s
                   has sent ripples in the corridors of   The CM had attended the conclud-  application for withdrawing the
                   power. The entire government ma-  ing ceremony of ‘Mumuksh Yuva   case against him-pending trial since
                   chinery was trying to shield him   Mahotsav’ on the invitation of Swa-  2011 and found sufficient material to
                   from being a close associate of RSS   mi Chinmayanand and shared food   initiate a trial. The court then issued
                   family who was three times BJP MP   with him and his close associates.   a bailable warrant against Swami
                   and minister of state for internal   Swami Chinmayanand is also the   Chinmayanand on May 25, 2018,
                   security during the Atal Bihari Vaj-  founder of Mumuksh Ashram De-  and also, directed him to be present



                    Will Swami Chinmayanand’s victim


                        be given justice after 14 years?




                       No matter how hard the Yogi Adityanath government tried to shield the alleged rape
                    accused and BJP member, Swami Chinmayanand, the issuance of bailable warrant against

                    him has entrusted a hope of fair trial and justice to the   victim’s quest, writes mudit mathur




                   payee government in 1999.     gree College. Also, Chinmayanand   before the court on the next date of
                     Swami Chinmayanand was suc-  and Yogi Adityanath are the disci-  the hearing,  July 12, to face further
                   cessful in evading his arrest even   ples of the same guru (master).  trial proceeding.
                   after a Sadhvi of his Ashram regis-  The BJP government withdrew   Mukesh Gupta, counsel for the
                   tered an FIR under charges of rape   the rape and kidnapping case   rape survivor told  Tehelka, “the
                   and kidnapping against him. His   against Swami Chinmayanand   court has accepted our application
                   arrest was stayed by the High Court   on 6 March 2018. In compliance   in which we have mentioned that
                   and he roamed freely during the   with the government’s decision, a   the state government cannot with-
                   slow pace of the investigations. De-  public prosecutor moved an ap-  draw this case as the complainant is
                   spite his indictment in the charge   plication under section 321 of CrPC   not willing to withdraw it. The court
                   sheet filed before the trial court,   (withdrawal from prosecution)   has rejected the state government’s
                   the trial did not proceed in view of   before the court on 12 March 2018.   application. The crime had affected
                   the orders of the High Court dated   Aggrieved by the decision of the   the life of the complainant and the
                   14.12.2012 that stayed further pro-  government, the rape victim ap-  state government doesn’t have the
                   ceedings in the case. After Yogi Adi-  proached various authorities in-  right to withdraw it.”
                   tyanath assumed office of the Chief   cluding the Chief Justice of India, Al-  The worst was when the victim
                   Minister, an over-confident Swami   lahabad High Court and Governor   alleged getting pregnant because of



                                           Tehelka / 15 june 2018  26  www.Tehelka.com



     26-28 Mudit.indd   2                                                                               06/06/18   1:19 PM
   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31