Page 63 - Tehelka Issue 13 - July 15, 2018
P. 63

Movie Review







       It brings new social symbols and char-  core represent the idea of democratic   proletariats would be the winner. The
       acteristics that are not seen much in the   socialism. It retold the epical battle be-  diversity erupts with different colors
       mainstream cinema before. First, it starts   tween the haves and have not’s in an   and dislodges the powerful elite from its
       with making the grandfather the hero   actual sociological space. This is differ-  throne. The mass turns into a revolution-
       of the film. The protagonist is not young,   ent from the Marxian brand of socialism.   ary hero and continues the struggle for
       perfect-bodied macho or a fair man- an   Here, the socialist politics is not meant to   dignity, land rights and justice.
       essential element of masala films. Sec-  reduce all the social and cultural identi-  This is indeed a popular narrative.
       ond, all the female leads are fiery, fem-  ties into a collective body as one working   The director only improvises the epical
       inist-kind and devoid from the typical   class but it uses and celebrates the pri-  tale by infusing a language and symbols
       moral appearances of the conventional   mordial (caste/communitarian/linguis-  unknown to the mainstream cinema.
       woman in the cinema. In Kaala’s home,   tic) identities to form a plural collective   He simply handed the flaming torch of
       the women are not submissive but vocal   of the people. Kaala thus offers a new   revolution to the actual oppressed social
       and independent. Third, the side-char-  socialist dream, under the leadership of   identities and provided it a heroic apos-
       acters are not superficial but identifiable   proletariat vanguard while functioning   tle. The story looks refreshing and real
       with the regular people that we see on   within the populist democracy.   with such vital changes.
       the streets. There is no bold make-up,   Further, the film endorses a hard   The traditional custodians of the cine-
       no dream sequences, no item song or no   definition of secularism. There are no   ma market will not be content with such
       character wears unrealistic flamboyant   mentions of ‘good religious values’ or   departure. The film is pulled down from
       attires. All the characters look absolutely   showcasing of communal rituals, instead   theatres for a banal commercial rea-
       real. Hence the background looks au-  it portrays the devotees of brahmanical   son, suggesting that the Salman Khan’s
       thentic and natural. In totality it gives the                       big release ‘Race-3’ needs more screens.
       audience a surreal experience.                                      However, this is not the sole reason for
          Importantly, the film does not hide   Kaala is an                its bad performance at the box office.
       the social demography of the charac-  epic retold in                The film reviewers, critics, trade pundits
       ters instead it displays it boldly. The vis-                        and other cinema experts depicted Kaala
       ible Dalit-Bahujan symbolism used in   contemporary                 as a ‘bad’ film and called it ‘inconsistent’
       the film makes each frame rich with                                 with the logic of popular entertainment.
       substantive sociological and ideologi-  context of Mumbai.          There was an overall condemnation for
       cal details. The audience of mainstream   Kaala (Rajnikant) is      its political overtones and ideological
       cinema is customized to see the hero as                             moorings. It was seen as a political rally
       the representative of upper caste culture.   the ‘Bhai’ of Dharavi,   to dislodge the current ruling elites in the
       The Hero would flag his Hindu social   who safeguards               power. It is also cornered as a film that
       identity and its religious culture with-                            flaunts deep cultural antagonism against
       out any apology. But Kaala is not a Hindu   his citadel with a      Hindu religion and for heralding radical
       upper caste hero. He belonged to a non-  private army               Ambedkarite politics as new revolution-
       brahmanic social tradition. The narrative                           ary force. The critics thus depict their
       suggests that he is a Tamil Dalit, settled in                       conservative fear and anxiety towards
       Dharavi and must have adopted a Bud-                                a film that tried to experiment with the
       dhist identity. On many occasions, the   rituals in negative light. The white and   dominant narrative style of filmmaking.
       film displays the engagement of the hero   disciplined house of Hari Dada is ar-  Whatever  may  be  its  commercial
       with the Dalit-Bahujan iconography and   ranged with bold display of Hindu reli-  success, Kaala did establish that the
       in one scene it even depicts the practice   gious symbols, but he is characterized as   ‘Dalit-Bahujan’ perspective has entered
       of untouchability. Thus the thick social   patriarchal, sexist political boss having   into mainstream cinema with a heroic
       realism used in the film brings it closer to   minimal respect for the life world of the   élan. The way Nagraj Manjule’s ‘Sairaat’
       the actual subaltern world and produce a   poor. But, the Dharavi appears irreligious,   impacted the story telling practices of
       counter narrative.                away from communal passion        Marathi cinema, there is a hope that
          Kaala is not only a display of alterna-  The question of land in the film is im-  ‘Kaala’ will also influence the other film
       tive social symbols but it also builds a   portant as it connects the diverse colors   world similarly. It has a potential to de-
       radical political alternative against the   of community and caste to become one   mocratize the film industry by carving a
       bourgeois rightwing politics of the cur-  revolutionary class at the climax. Here,   dignified space in which the imaginative
       rent times. It showcases the growing   the poor are not handicap and oppres-  fiction of the marginalized people can be
       democratic consciousness of the Lower   sive subjects but conscious and radical   showcased and appreciated without fear
       Castes, religious minorities, women and   agents. Between the battle of massive   and prejudices.
       other working class people in the de-  poor majority and a tiny oppressive so-
       praved land of Dharavi. The films at its   cial elites, it is inevitable that the heroic   letters@tehelka.com



                                            Tehelka / 15 july 2018  63  www.Tehelka.com



     62-63 Film Kerala.indd   3                                                                         03/07/18   4:12 PM
   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68