Page 46 - 31MAY2019E
P. 46

Cooling off period waived for divorce



                 he Delhi High Court has                                  ings under the Domestic Violence Act,
                 come to the aid of a woman   The ruling relies on a verdict   2005, the parties settled their disputes
                 who is set to remarry soon   of the Supreme Court which   through mediation.
                 by waiving the cooling off   had said that divorce can be   A settlement took place that the
         T period for divorce from her                                    marriage be dissolved by mutual con-
         estranged husband. Justice Prateek   granted without the mandatory   sent and it was agreed that the man
         Jalan noted that there does not    18-month period of separation   would pay Rs 3.5 lakh to the woman.
         appear to be any likelihood of recon-                            They approached the family court to
         ciliation between the estranged couple   between the parties, writes   dissolve the marriage and after com-
         and relied on a verdict of the Supreme   tehelka bureau          pletion of first motion, the parties filed
         Court which had ruled that divorce                               an application for waiver of the statu-
         can be granted without the mandatory   It set aside an order of a family court   tory period of six months.
         18-month period of separation between   which  had  rejected  the  woman’s   The woman intended to remarry
         the parties.                     application.                    another person on May 2 but a day
           The apex court had, in 2017, said   The high court said a holistic reading   before, the family court rejected the
         that the six month “cooling off” period   of the apex court’s judgement leads to   plea for wavier of the statutory period
         can be waived by the courts in cases of    the conclusion that purposeless mar-  of six months. The high court said the
         divorce through mutual  consent.   riage which has no chance of reunion   safeguards contained in the statue are
         The high court allowed a petition by   ought not to be prolonged. The man   intended to explore every avenue of
         the woman for waiving the statutory    and woman had got married in July   reconciliation and avoid an impulsive
         period of six months under Section   2017 and started living separately from   decision to break a marriage.
         13B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.   October 25, 2017. During the proceed-  “In the present case, there does not









































                                          Tehelka / 31 may 2019  46  www.Tehelka.com
   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51