Page 41 - 15MAY2019E
P. 41

media







































           However the CAB issue reached to   ligence agencies and banned terrorist   However, the LRO convener lately
         the media fraternity of Assam in a differ-  groups to media owners and all other   made it clear that they opposed the edi-
         ent incarnation as a Maharashtra based   possible aspects related to it’. The letter   tors for spreading anti-national propa-
         voluntary organization lodged an offi-  also added that on various occasions,   gandas during the turmoil and certainly
         cial complaint against five media outlets    these media outlets had openly pro-  not for their stand in favour or against
         alleging that those exploited the turmoil   fessed the need to take up arms against   of the CAB. Asserting that they respect
         over CAB and helped banned militant   New Delhi and broadcast propaganda   anyone’s stand on political issues, the
         outfits in their fresh recruitment drives.   videos of militant cadres.  convener reiterated that they would
         Following the accusation of Legal Rights   Responding to the LRO letter, Union   continue pursuing with the responsible
         Observatory (LRO), the Union Home   home ministry official Sanjeev Kumar   authorities against the violent propa-
         Ministry had asked the State government   sent an official communiqué to  Assam   ganda so that Assam can be saved from
         in Dispur to take necessary actions.  police chief Kuladhar Saikia and State   burning again.
           Vinay Joshi, convener of LRO in his   home  secretary Ashutosh Agnihotri   Earlier a Guwahati based concerned
         public grievance petition sent on 14 Feb-  on 16 April directing to take necessary    citizen (Biswajit Nath) sent a memo-
         ruary 2019 accused four editors namely   actions in the matter. However the com-  randum to PMO describing suspicious
         Ajit Kumar Bhuyan (chief editor of Prag   muniqué had neither mentioned of any   behaviour of some print and electronic
         News channel), Nitumoni Saikia (editor   enquiry against the concerned editors   media outlets of the State. His letter on
         of Pratidin Time news channel), Man-  nor asked for any follow-up report from   26 November 2018 asserted that a sec-
         jit Mahanta (former executive editor of    the State government.    tion of scribes always glorified the insur-
         Asomiya Pratidin newspaper) and Afrida   But twisted with facts, few media   gents and often highlighted Ulfa(I) leader
         Hussain (editor of InsideNE news portal)   outlets reported that the Centre was   Barua with live interviews. As usual, the
         of propagating militant’s ideology to give   going for investigations against the edi-  Centre on 22 February asked the State
         them a fresh boost in the sideline of anti-  tors who opposed the CAB and actions   government to take appropriate actions
         CAB rows.                         against them. They simply projected the   in the matter.
           The LRO letter also urged the ministry   issue as an anti-media conspiracy of the
         to ‘investigate role of suspicious Assam   Union government led by Prime Minis-  The author is a Northeast India-based
         media outlets and their owners, their    ter Narendra Modi and tried to gather           media activist
         financial transactions, source of income,   moral supports from the media frater-
         possible flow of funds from foreign intel-  nity across the country.                 letters@tehelka.com



                                          Tehelka / 15 may 2019  41  www.Tehelka.com
   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46