{"id":323222,"date":"2020-05-16T04:16:39","date_gmt":"2020-05-16T04:16:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/tehelka.com\/?p=323222"},"modified":"2020-05-16T06:46:33","modified_gmt":"2020-05-16T06:46:33","slug":"covid-19-unshackles-lawyers-from-colonial-dress-code","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/tehelka.com\/covid-19-unshackles-lawyers-from-colonial-dress-code\/","title":{"rendered":"Covid-19 unshackles Lawyers from Colonial Dress Code"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-full wp-image-323225 aligncenter\" src=\"http:\/\/tehelka.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/uniform.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"604\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/tehelka.com\/media\/2020\/05\/uniform.jpg 604w, https:\/\/tehelka.com\/media\/2020\/05\/uniform-300x149.jpg 300w, https:\/\/tehelka.com\/media\/2020\/05\/uniform-324x160.jpg 324w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 604px) 100vw, 604px\" \/>On May 13th , 2020, the Supreme Court, as a precautionary measure to contain the\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">spread of Corona virus infection, has relaxed the dress code for Advocates appearing\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">before it through video conferencing. Now the &#8220;advocates may wear &#8220;plain white shirt\/white-salwar-kameez\/ white saree, with a plain white neck band&#8221; during the\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">hearings before the Supreme Court of India through Virtual Court System till medical\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">exigencies exist or until further orders.&#8221; The court has temporarily done away with the\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">requirement of wearing gowns, for the time being. The directions will come into force\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">with immediate effect. This diktat from the Apex Court comes as a soothing breeze to the\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">legal fraternity after having lost in all the legal avenues to get emancipation from the\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">colonial dress code.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">Needless to say that dress code is a symbol of confidence, a symbol of discipline and a\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">symbol of the profession, a proud part of a lawyer\u2019s personality as a professional. India in<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">terms of Lawyer\u2019s dress code traces its legacy from British rule with some minor\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">modifications made at times. The Advocate\u2019s Act of 1961 makes it mandatory for a\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">lawyer to wear a black robe or coat with a white neckband on top of it in the continuity of\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">the same. The dress of an Advocate serves a very useful purpose. In the first place, it\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">distinguishes an Advocate from a litigant or other members of the public, who may be\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">jostling with him in a Court room. When a lawyer is in prescribed dress his identity can\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">never be mistaken. However, lawyers from both the sides, the petitioner and the\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">respondent, wear a similar dress code.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">Since independence, a large section of legal fraternity had been agitating by filing cases\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">against the rigours imposed by the dress code and its unsuitability in the diverse climate<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">conditions throughout the length and breadth of this country. It was pleaded that what\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">was relevant in a cold climate like that of the U. K., the same could not work in a hot\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">climate like ours. In 2014, 2016 and 2017, lawyers in jurisdictions of Madras and\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">Calcutta High Courts, agitated that due to sweltering heat in their regions, they should be\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">exempted from wearing black coats during the months of summer as was the practice in\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">Punjab &amp; Haryana High Court jurisdiction. This was ultimately acceded to.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">The dress code as per the Bar Council Regulations, mandates that the advocates\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">appearing in the Supreme Court, High Courts, Subordinate Courts, Tribunals or\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">Authorities, to appear sober and dignified, wear prescribed white and black dresses with\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">white bands or black tie. Wearing of Advocates\u2019 gown shall be optional except when\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">appearing in the Supreme Court or in High Courts. Except in Supreme Court and High\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">Courts, during summer wearing black coat is not mandatory. An unfounded obsession\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">with the formal dress code compelled certain courts to literally hold that appearing\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">without the prescribed dress was to show disrespect and as such the Court was certainly\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">entitled to refuse audience. Courts insisted that the formal attire associated with certain\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">professions and the utility and necessity of ceremonial dress is recognized in many\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">countries, hence the prescribed dress code must be followed.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">Various High Courts and even the Supreme Court repelled all such attempts by holding\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">that no doubt rules framed by the Bar Council make it imperative for an Advocate to\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">appear in Court at all times only in the prescribed dress, yet the power to preclude an\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">Advocate from appearing in Court is by necessary implication vested in that Court in\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">order to enforce the observance of the prescribed dress. The present article captures the\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">journey of lawyer\u2019s dress code. Black and white are considered symbols of the legal\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">profession throughout world barring few exceptions. Black colour on the positive side\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">signifies the strength and authority and the white colour signifies light, goodness,\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">innocence, and purity.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">Legal system is looked upon as the only hope of justice for a common man, the colour\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">white is chosen to represent him. Advocate\u2019s white bands represent the upholding of the laws of God and of men. This is followed by all countries based on Anglo-Saxon Jurisprudence, where it is widely believed that the dress induces a seriousness of purpose and a sense of decorum which are highly conducive to the dispensation of justice. In the United States, however, the attorneys appearing before the court are required to wear a conservative business dress only.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">Under the Advocates Act, 1961, two classes of advocates are recognized, Senior Advocates and other Advocates. While the rule framed by the Bar Council of India does not make out any distinction in dress or prescribe the design of a different gown or coat for a senior advocate, yet the distinction has been maintained and followed by a practice of long-standing, even prior to the Advocates Act of 1961. Conscientious sections among the lawyers have pleaded even before the Apex Court that the rules under the Advocates\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">Act did not distinguish between \u201cseniors\u201d and other advocates as far as their dress was\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">concerned. The senior advocates wear twin coats with gowns which is slightly different\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">from those worn by other advocates, though the use of such coats and gowns by the\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">senior advocates was illegal as no tradition could override a statute, unless specifically\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">provided for by law enacted by the Parliament.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">Since the right to designate an Advocate as a Senior Advocate vests only with the High Courts and the Supreme Court, therefore, to preserve their own right to confer a sort of\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">title (notwithstanding what the Article 18 stipulates), the courts, for the reasons known\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">to themselves only, have recognized a distinct class among the Advocates, which as per\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">the Court, constitute a different class within the advocates. Based on the ability, knowledge, experience, expertise and standing at the bar, an advocate is designated as a senior advocate. In view of the Court it was an honour and distinction conferred by the court itself in \u201crecognition of the ability and standing\u201d (?) of the concerned advocate. Therefore, the wearing of a distinct gown or a coat by a senior advocate, which is different from the one worn by advocates, cannot be questioned or assailed as discriminatory or violative of Art.\u00a014\u00a0of the Constitution of India.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">The Senior Advocates, so designated by the Court, are given a special right of audience\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">(right to be attended to) by the Court in preference to other Advocates. As a harsh ground reality only the designated Senior Advocates take almost the whole working time of the Court by their acts, which includes shenanigans like PILs etc., thus filling their own coffers at the expense of less fortunate class of \u201cother Advocates\u201d. The traditional dress code has led to a situation where one class of professionals with the same academic qualifications and the same experience is overfed while the other is under nourished by a quirk of dress code. Now that Legal Professionals stand emancipated by the benign effect of Covid-19, it is hoped and prayed that the dress now prescribed by the Apex Court on ad-hoc basis, shall become a permanent feature of the Indian Courts.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On May 13th , 2020, the Supreme Court, as a precautionary measure to contain the\u00a0spread of Corona virus infection, has relaxed the dress code for Advocates appearing\u00a0before it through video conferencing. Now the &#8220;advocates may wear &#8220;plain white shirt\/white-salwar-kameez\/ white saree, with a plain white neck band&#8221; during the\u00a0hearings before the Supreme Court of India [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":130,"featured_media":323225,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[36,1],"tags":[12015,134],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/tehelka.com\/rest-api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/323222"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/tehelka.com\/rest-api\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/tehelka.com\/rest-api\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tehelka.com\/rest-api\/wp\/v2\/users\/130"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tehelka.com\/rest-api\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=323222"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/tehelka.com\/rest-api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/323222\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":323226,"href":"https:\/\/tehelka.com\/rest-api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/323222\/revisions\/323226"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tehelka.com\/rest-api\/wp\/v2\/media\/323225"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/tehelka.com\/rest-api\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=323222"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tehelka.com\/rest-api\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=323222"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tehelka.com\/rest-api\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=323222"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}