Current Affairs A- A+

Rape. And How Men See It

Dozens of conversations provide a fascinating window into the psyche of the Indian male. Some of it dark. Some of it hopeful.
Tehelka Bureau
Tehelka Bureau
19-01-2013, Issue 3 Volume 10

Photo: AP

THIS IS A MOMENT THAT COULD GO EITHER WAY. It can deepen a crucial engagement or it can leave one with the chaotic debris of a fierce, but passing storm. As the intense outrage over the gangrape in New Delhi on 16 December begins to live out its heat, it’s imperative to question, which of these will we be left with?

Over the past few weeks, many angry questions have been hurled at the police, the judiciary and the political establishment. The failures of the State are staggering and one cannot be grateful enough for the initial rage and outpouring on the street. Without that, there would have been no conversation.

But there is an urgent need now for calmer review, for genuine and calibrated suggestions that can lead to long- and short-term change. There is a need also to ask, are we framing this discourse wisely? Can its shrillness or the suggested remedies have adverse impacts one did not intend?

Before examining any of that though, there is a big missing piece that must find voice. The anger against the State — the demand for greater efficiencies and accountability — is hugely legitimate. But what about the giant shadow in the room? How endemic is the prejudice that stalks our society? What produces and perpetuates it? What creates the idea of women as ‘fair game’ for sexual violence? What, in effect, do Indian men think about women?

Read More>

 


~ALSO READ~

Indian men on women: In their own words

Conversations on what creates the idea of women as ‘fair game’ for sexual violence
By Tehelka Bureau Read More> 

 

What we need to fix and how

Tehelka zooms in on the institutional, attitudinal and educational reforms needed to ensure better security for women of this country
By Revati Laul Read More> 

 

Scary nights at the call centre

The rape has reinforced the fears of women working after sunset in India’s sunrise industry
By Shaili Chopra Read More> 

 

We need reform, not retribution

Changing the law is not the answer to rising crimes by juveniles
By Anant Asthana Read More> 

 

Forget sensitisation, at least do your duty

Instead of training cops to be sensitive, let us make them adhere to the rule of law
By Flavia Agnes Read More> 

 

Objects on screen only reflect a partial picture

Our cinema still caters to the male gaze but it’s not the same as violence against women
By Anusha Rizvi Read More> 

(Published in Tehelka Magazine, Volume 10 Issue 3, Dated 19 January 2013)

4 Comments

  • Sorry to be off topic, but (a) the link to the rest of the story is broken and (b) Tehelka has failed to give image credit (the photo is by Kevin Frayer)

  • I have a thought… What would Mahatma Gandhi think of the commonplace rape of women and the acceptance of it by much of India’s male population?

    Gandhi is probably ignored by most today in India. It certainly looks that way anyway. But could anyone believe even for one second that he would do anything but speak out against such practices and condemn the rapists? He might also say to the young not to be so impatient, be respecful to ancient customs and traditions, perhaps for young women to dress more demurely and not to press for change too rapidly. But this is all conjecture.

    I looked the great man up on Wikipedia and include the following quote, which relates to his work with India’s Untouchables in the 1930s. In my view India can never claim to be a civilised or spiritual nation, despite the wisdom of the Vedas and all the good that issued forth from that great country. Not when it treats its own women as the Untouchables of the 21st century. To think people used to complain – often with just cause it must be said – about the treatment metered out by the British. Yet who needs Imperialists when your own people treat you this way?

    (Wikipedia on Gandhi): ‘On 8 May 1933, Gandhi began a 21-day fast of self-purification and launched a one-year campaign to help the Harijan movement (Gandhi’s term for Dalits, meaning ‘Children of God’).[81] This new campaign was not universally embraced within the Dalit community, as B. R. Ambedkar condemned Gandhi’s use of the term Harijans as saying that Dalits were socially immature, and that privileged caste Indians played a paternalistic role… Gandhi and Ambedkar often clashed because Ambedkar sought to remove the Dalits out of the Hindu community, while Gandhi tried to save Hinduism by exorcising untouchability (thus purifying it of one of the cancers which had poisoned it over the centuries perhaps?). Ambedkar complained that Gandhi moved too slowly, while Hindu traditionalists said Gandhi was a dangerous radical who rejected scripture. Guha noted in 2012 that, “Ideologues have carried these old rivalries into the present, with the demonization of Gandhi now common among politicians who presume to speak in Ambedkar’s name.”[83] Guha adds that their work complemented each other, and Gandhi often praised Ambedkar.’

    All very sad really…

  • Hi Shoma, I don’t know if you understand Telugu but here is a video of a “guru” giving discourse on human relations. I don’t know how to put it mildly, but this guy really talks crap. You may say he is a stiff competetion to Asaram Babu. My parents follow him so religiously and buy in to all the non sense he preaches. I wage a war at my home to change their way of thinking but it is difficult when people of this kind keep giving lectures about “Ideal children, Ideal Wife etc” everyday. I really don’t know how we can fight these idiots.

  • By birth and nature woman is a bit below man. Once this truth is recognized by women lots of problems related to molestaion, rapes etc. can be put under control. The motive behind female infanticide is an expression in support of this truth and quite contrary to the libbers’ view of equlity. According to “The Hindu” report on 09-10-2012 girl child numbers in India have shown a sharper decline than the male children in the decade beginning 2001, leading to a skewed child sex ratio. ‘Equality’ doesn’t mean same stature in ll walks of life. Equality should come in the minds of ‘MAN’. That is how SHAKTHI is acquired by MAN. Legal impositions, or government rules and regulaions will not bring about “EQUALITY”. Male chauvinists are weak to the core of their hearts! Because they don’t have PEACE in their lives. WOMAN is complementary to MAN in fulfilling LIFE!

Subscribe to our newsletter

Select a list: